Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29384265›Full record

ArticlePediatric blood & cancer2018

Development of the "Day 100 Talk": Addressing existing communication gaps during the early cancer treatment period in childhood cancer.

Angela M Feraco, Sarah R Brand, Joshua Gagne, Amy Sullivan, Susan D Block, Joanne Wolfe

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Pediatric blood & cancer, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. The Nurse's Role in Prognosis-Related Communication in Pediatric Oncology Nursing Practice.Journal of pediatric oncology nursing : official journal of the Association of Pediatric Oncology Nurses
    Article
  11. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Angela M FeracoDana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-6731-4907
Sarah R BrandDana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, United States.
Joshua GagneDana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, United States.
Amy SullivanHarvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, United States.
Susan D BlockDana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, United States.
Joanne WolfeDana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, United States.

Funding

PATHOPHYSIOLOGY OF HUMAN BLOOD CELLST32HL007574 · NHLBI · CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL BOSTON · PI Daniel Evan Bauer · 1985 to 2026
$18.4M
NHLBI NIH HHS T32 HL007574
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundFamilies' communication needs during the early cancer treatment period (ECTP) may not be optimally met by current practices. We sought to identify potential communication gaps and to ameliorate these by developing a novel in-depth conversation between families and their pediatric oncologists, the "Day 100 Talk" (D100), during the ECTP. PROCEDURE: We conducted semistructured interviews with parents and patients undergoing childhood cancer treatment for < 7 months. Interviews sought to elicit perceived communication gaps regarding cancer care and inform D100 development. Following qualitative analysis of interview responses, we developed a three-part D100 conversation tool consisting of a preparatory family worksheet, a conversation guide, and a family summary sheet. We presented the tool during interviews and a focus group with pediatric oncology providers and revised it to incorporate provider input.

resultsTwenty-two stakeholders (six parents, five adolescents, and 11 providers) participated in interviews or a focus group. Parents and patients perceived insufficient anticipatory guidance as the most important communication gap. They also reported sometimes withholding worries and cancer-related beliefs. Meanwhile, oncology providers worried about "opening Pandora's Box" and limited clinical time. Additionally, providers reported employing indirect methods such as surmising to determine families' needs and relying on psychosocial clinicians to engage families around potentially "taboo" issues of emotional coping and spirituality.

conclusionCreating a communication occasion (D100), ensuring complementary disciplinary expertise through joint participation by oncologists and psychosocial clinicians, and providing a conversation tool to prompt disclosure by families and facilitate anticipatory guidance may ameliorate existing communication gaps during the ECTP.

Indexed as

CommunicationDecision MakingOncologistsParentsAdaptation, PsychologicalAdolescentAdultChildChild, PreschoolFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansInfantMaleNeoplasmsProfessional-Family Relationschildhood cancer communicationcommunication skills trainingconversation guidesearly cancer treatment periodpediatric oncologyserious illness communication

Identifiers

PMID29384265
PMCPMC5911188

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.