Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29384029›Full record

ArticleJournal of managed care & specialty pharmacy2018

Evaluation of a Pharmacist-Managed Diabetes Program in a Primary Care Setting Within an Integrated Health Care System.

Amanda W Benedict, Michele M Spence, John L Sie, Helen A Chin, Chi D Ngo, Jennifer F Salmingo, Andrew T Vidaurreta, Nazia Rashid

Abstract readEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of managed care & specialty pharmacy, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. A mixed-methods approach to understanding pharmacists' experiences with the CANRISK diabetes risk questionnaire and user guide.Health promotion and chronic disease prevention in Canada : research, policy and practice · 2026
    Article
  5. A primer on clinical programs in managed care pharmacy.Journal of managed care & specialty pharmacy · 2026
    Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Endocrinology/Primary Care Pharmacy Collaboration vs Endocrinology Care Alone in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes and A1c >9.The Journal of pharmacy technology : jPT : official publication of the Association of Pharmacy Technicians · 2024
    Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. [The Economic Evaluation of the GLICEMIA 2.0 Study as an Example of a Complex Intervention].Gesundheitswesen (Bundesverband der Arzte des Offentlichen Gesundheitsdienstes (Germany)) · 2022
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Pharmacist-Managed Diabetes Programs: Improving Treatment Adherence and Patient Outcomes.Diabetes, metabolic syndrome and obesity : targets and therapy · 2022
    Review
  20. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Amanda W Benedict1 Kaiser Permanente Downey Medical Center, Downey, California.
Michele M Spence2 Drug Information Services and Pharmacy Outcomes Research Group, Kaiser Permanente California Region, Downey, California.
John L Sie1 Kaiser Permanente Downey Medical Center, Downey, California.
Helen A Chin1 Kaiser Permanente Downey Medical Center, Downey, California.
Chi D Ngo1 Kaiser Permanente Downey Medical Center, Downey, California.
Jennifer F Salmingo1 Kaiser Permanente Downey Medical Center, Downey, California.
Andrew T Vidaurreta3 Drug Use Management, Kaiser Permanente Northwest Region, Portland, Oregon.
Nazia Rashid2 Drug Information Services and Pharmacy Outcomes Research Group, Kaiser Permanente California Region, Downey, California.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPharmacists have important roles in managing the therapy of patients with type 2 diabetes and improving patient care. Pharmacists titrate medications; reinforce patient education; and address care gaps, such as medication adherence, vaccinations, and overdue health screenings. Through these efforts and more, pharmacists help to improve patient care and achieve Healthcare Effectiveness Data and Information Set (HEDIS) measures. Thus, it is important to demonstrate improved health outcomes through pharmacist contributions to diabetes management, which can then provide an opportunity to expand the role of clinical pharmacists in other medical centers and practice settings within an integrated health care system.

objectiveTo evaluate the effect of a pharmacist-managed program within a primary care setting by determining the percentage of patients who reached the HEDIS goal of hemoglobin A1c (A1c) < 8.0%, the time needed to reach this goal, and A1c reduction in patients with type 2 diabetes.

methodsThis retrospective cohort study identified patients aged 18-74 years who had uncontrolled A1c ≥ 8.0%. Patients in the Complete Care Program (CCP) had their diabetes therapy managed by a pharmacist and were propensity score matched to a comparison group of usual care (UC) patients. Multivariate regression analyses and a Cox proportional hazards model compared the change in A1c from baseline and the time to A1c goal between the 2 groups.

resultsThere were no significant differences in baseline characteristics between the CCP and UC patients (n = 980 patients per group). CCP patients were significantly more likely to achieve the HEDIS goal of A1c < 8% at 3 months (OR = 2.44, 95% CI = 1.93-3.10, P < 0.0001) and at 6 months (OR = 1.32, 95% CI = 1.08-1.61, P = 0.007) compared with the UC patients. CCP patients also reached the A1c goal significantly faster: 3.4 months versus 4.6 months (P < 0.0001), even after controlling for covariates (HR = 1.24, 95% CI = 1.09-1.41, P = 0.001). Change in baseline A1c was -0.95% versus -0.54% (P < 0.0001) at 3 months and -1.19% versus -0.99% (P = 0.008) at 6 months for CCP versus UC patients, respectively.

conclusionsType 2 diabetes therapy management by clinical pharmacists was associated with a greater percentage of patients achieving the HEDIS goal of A1c < 8.0%, reaching the A1c goal faster, and a greater A1c reduction from baseline at 3 and 6 months of follow-up compared with patients receiving usual care. DISCLOSURES: No funding was provided to support this research study. The authors report no potential conflicts of interest relevant to this article. All authors contributed to the study concept and design. Benedict and Spence performed data analysis and interpretation. The manuscript was written by Benedict, with assistance from Spence and Rashid. All authors reviewed and contributed to manuscript revisions. Spence is the guarantor of this work and, as such, had full access to all the data in the study and takes responsibility for the integrity of the data and the accuracy of the data analysis. Parts of this study were presented at the AMCP Managed Care and Specialty Pharmacy Annual Meeting; San Francisco, California; April 19-22, 2016.

Indexed as

Professional RoleAdolescentAdultAgedBiomarkersBlood GlucoseChi-Square DistributionCommunity Pharmacy ServicesDelivery of Health Care, IntegratedDiabetes Mellitus, Type 2FemaleGlycated HemoglobinHealth StatusHumansHypoglycemic AgentsInterdisciplinary CommunicationBiomarkersBlood GlucoseGlycated Hemoglobinhemoglobin A1c protein, humanHypoglycemic Agents

Identifiers

PMID29384029
PMCPMC10398151

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.