Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29384026›Full record

ArticleJournal of managed care & specialty pharmacy2018

Evaluation of an Academic-Community Partnership to Implement MTM Services in Rural Communities to Improve Pharmaceutical Care for Patients with Diabetes and/or Hypertension.

Melissa Johnson, Rebecca Jastrzab, Jared Tate, Kate Johnson, Elizabeth Hall-Lipsy, Rose Martin, Ann M Taylor, Terri Warholak

Abstract readEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of managed care & specialty pharmacy, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Melissa Johnson1 Medication Management Center, University of Arizona College of Pharmacy, Tucson.
Rebecca Jastrzab2 University of Arizona Mel and Enid Zuckerman College of Public Health, Tucson.
Jared Tate3 University of Arizona College of Pharmacy, Tucson.
Kate Johnson1 Medication Management Center, University of Arizona College of Pharmacy, Tucson.
Elizabeth Hall-Lipsy3 University of Arizona College of Pharmacy, Tucson.
Rose Martin4 SinfoniaRx, Tucson, Arizona.
Ann M Taylor3 University of Arizona College of Pharmacy, Tucson.
Terri Warholak3 University of Arizona College of Pharmacy, Tucson.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAlthough the current methods of medication therapy management (MTM) delivery have demonstrably improved therapeutic, safety, economic, and humanistic health outcomes, patient- and prescriber-level barriers persist, limiting its reach and effectiveness.

objectiveTo assess telephonic- and community-based clinical pharmacy services in improving health indicators for rural, underserved patients.

methodsIn 2014, an established MTM provider created a novel, collaborative pilot program with independent retail and community health center pharmacies to provide comprehensive, telephonic MTM services to rural Arizonans. This pilot program used a combined telephonic- and community-based pharmacist approach in the provision of MTM services for rural, underserved Arizona populations. Adults with diabetes mellitus and/or hypertension, seen by a prescriber or who filled prescriptions at a contracted, rural facility in 2014, were eligible to participate. Initial MTM telephonic consultations were conducted, and recommendations were communicated to patients' prescribers and/or pharmacists. Patients received a follow-up telephone call at standard intervals, depending on risk severity.

resultsA total of 517 patients participated, and 237 medication-related and 1,102 health promotion interventions were completed. Positive trends were observed in fasting blood glucose, postprandial glucose, and diastolic blood pressure. Broad variation in prescriber acceptance of pharmacist recommendations was observed (27%-60%).

conclusionsStudy results provide initial evidence to support the efficacy of collaborative efforts in the provision of MTM services for improving health indicators and safety measures while potentially reducing health care disparities. While the results are encouraging, future research is warranted in more diverse populations and settings. DISCLOSURES: This work was supported in part by funding from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention via a multiyear, interagency grant from the Arizona Department of Health Services. The findings and conclusions presented in this article are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official position of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention nor the Arizona Department of Health Services. Study concept and design were contributed by M. Johnson, Jastrzab, Hall-Lipsy, Martin, and Warholak. M. Johnson took the lead in data collection, along with K. Johnson, Martin, Jastrzab, and Hall-Lipsy. Data interpretation was performed by Jastrzab, Warholak, and Taylor. The manuscript was written by K. Johnson, M. Johnson, and Jastrzab, along with the other authors, and revised by M. Johnson, Tate, and Taylor, along with Jastrzab, K. Johnson, and Hall-Lipsy. The data from this manuscript were previously presented in poster and podium format by Jastrzab and Johnson at the American Public Health Annual Meeting; Chicago, Illinois; October 31-November 4, 2015.

Indexed as

Public-Private Sector PartnershipsAdolescentAdultAgedAntihypertensive AgentsArizonaAttitude of Health PersonnelBiomarkersBlood GlucoseBlood PressureCommunity Pharmacy ServicesDelivery of Health Care, IntegratedDiabetes MellitusFemaleHealthcare DisparitiesHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeAntihypertensive AgentsBiomarkersBlood GlucoseHypoglycemic Agents

Identifiers

PMID29384026
PMCPMC10397983

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.