ArticleOrthopaedic surgery2018
Detecting the Presence of Bacterial DNA and RNA by Polymerase Chain Reaction to Diagnose Suspected Periprosthetic Joint Infection after Antibiotic Therapy.
Article in Orthopaedic surgery, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 22 citations in OpenAlex.
- Reliable Diagnostic Tests and Thresholds for Preoperative Diagnosis of Non-Inflammatory Arthritis Periprosthetic Joint Infection: A Meta-analysis and Systematic Review.Orthopaedic surgery · 2022Pooled it
- Comparison between DNA- and RNA-based nucleic acid amplification tests for detecting Mycoplasma pneumoniae in pediatric specimens.European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology · 2026Article
- Clinical characteristics of culture-negative periprosthetic joint infections: findings from an international periprosthetic joint infection registry.Journal of bone and joint infection · 2025Article
- Diagnostic Performance of a Molecular Assay in Synovial Fluid Targeting Dominant Prosthetic Joint Infection Pathogens.Microorganisms · 2024Article
- Development of advanced control material for reverse transcription-mediated bacterial nucleic acid amplification tests.Journal of clinical microbiology · 2024Article
- Debridement, antibiotics, and implant retention in non-oncological femoral megaprosthesis infections: minimum 5 year follow-up.Journal of experimental orthopaedics · 2022Article
- Development and Evaluation of Rapid and Accurate CRISPR/Cas13-Based RNA Diagnostics forFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2022Article
- Think Twice before Prescribing Antibiotics for That Swollen Knee: The Influence of Antibiotics on the Diagnosis of Periprosthetic Joint Infection.Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Review
- Advantages of 16S rRNA PCR for the diagnosis of prosthetic joint infection.Experimental and therapeutic medicine · 2020Article
- Current Clinical Methods for Detection of Peri-Prosthetic Joint Infection.Surgical infections · 2020Review
- Detecting the presence of bacterial RNA by polymerase chain reaction in low volumes of preoperatively aspirated synovial fluid from prosthetic joint infections.Bone & joint research · 2020Article
- Value of mNGS in sonication fluid for the diagnosis of periprosthetic joint infection.Arthroplasty (London, England) · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo explore the diagnostic efficiency of DNA-based and RNA-based quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) analyses for periprosthetic joint infection (PJI).
methodsTo determine the detection limit of DNA-based and RNA-based qPCR in vitro, Staphylococcus aureus and Escherichia coli strains were added to sterile synovial fluid obtained from a patient with knee osteoarthritis. Serial dilutions of samples were analyzed by DNA-based and RNA-based qPCR. Clinically, patients who were suspected of having PJI and eventually underwent revision arthroplasty in our hospital from July 2014 to December 2016 were screened. Preoperative puncture or intraoperative collection was performed on patients who met the inclusion and exclusion criteria to obtain synovial fluid. DNA-based and RNA-based PCR analyses and culture were performed on each synovial fluid sample. The patients' demographic characteristics, medical history, and laboratory test results were recorded. The diagnostic efficiency of both PCR assays was compared with culture methods.
resultsThe in vitro analysis demonstrated that DNA-based qPCR assay was highly sensitive, with the detection limit being 1200 colony forming units (CFU)/mL of S. aureus and 3200 CFU/mL of E. coli. Meanwhile, The RNA-based qPCR assay could detect 2300 CFU/mL of S. aureus and 11 000 CFU/mL of E. coli. Clinically, the sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy were 65.7%, 100%, and 81.6%, respectively, for the culture method; 81.5%, 84.8%, and 83.1%, respectively, for DNA-based qPCR; and 73.6%, 100%, and 85.9%, respectively, for RNA-based qPCR.
conclusionsDNA-based qPCR could detect suspected PJI with high sensitivity after antibiotic therapy. RNA-based qPCR could reduce the false positive rates of DNA-based assays. qPCR-based methods could improve the efficiency of PJI diagnosis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.