ArticleJournal of gambling studies2018
Public Awareness and Practice of Responsible Gambling in Macao.
Article in Journal of gambling studies, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed.
- Gambling behaviors in Israeli adults: findings from a nationally representative sample.Israel journal of health policy research · 2025Article
- The Role of Self-Esteem and Self-Efficacy in Responsible Gambling.Journal of gambling studies · 2025Article
- Who is Getting the Message? Sociodemographic Factors and Gambling Behavior Associated with Awareness of the Swedish National Self-Exclusion Registry Spelpaus.se.Journal of gambling studies · 2025Article
- Effect of Responsible Gaming Policy and Practice on Casino Gaming Behavior.Journal of gambling studies · 2024Article
- What is known about population level programs designed to address gambling-related harm: rapid review of the evidence.Harm reduction journal · 2024Review
- Understanding and addressing the challenges of online gambling addiction in mainland China.General psychiatry · 2024Article
- Profiling of Gamblers and Problem Gamblers Among Casino Patrons in Macao SAR.Journal of gambling studies · 2023Article
- Employee Perceptions of Responsible Gambling in Macao: Concepts, Indicators, and Intervention Barriers.Journal of gambling studies · 2023Article
- Qualitative Experience of Self-Exclusion Programs: A Scoping Review.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023Article
- Satisfaction of Basic Psychological Needs and Adherence to Responsible Gambling Practices: The Mediating Role of Flourishing.Journal of gambling studies · 2022Article
- The prospective effect of purpose in life on gambling disorder and psychological flourishing among university students.Journal of behavioral addictions · 2020Article
- Validation and Application of the Positive Play Scale Adapted for Chinese Gamblers: Its Relation to Disordered Gambling and Gambling Attitudes.Frontiers in psychology · 2020Article
- Application of Health Belief Model to Practice of Responsible Gambling.Journal of gambling studies · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Responsible gambling (RG) is a relatively new concept to the Macao gambling industry. Although recent studies reported a heightened public awareness of RG, the prevalence of disordered gambling is still high. This discrepancy may suggest an existing gap between RG awareness and gambling practices, pinpointing aspects that need to be improved by different RG stakeholders. The gap may be attributable to people's limited knowledge toward practices favoring RG. To explore means for enhancing the RG campaign, we studied Macao residents' interpretation and adoption of RG practices. In Study 1, a random community sample was collected to assess the extent to which common RG practices were adopted. Results suggested that there was a fair proportion of gamblers not adhering to them and gambling disorder tendency was related to the adoption of RG practices. It implied a successful promotion of RG practices may reduce gambling problems. In Study 2, focus group discussions were conducted to explore how RG was conceptualized. Twenty-five participants (including 11 casino employees) took part in four focus group interviews. All participants were aware of RG but their knowledge of RG practices was limited. Very few of them were able to identify major practices such as putting constraints on gambling amount and time and the application for self-exclusion. We argue that future RG promotion needs to be more specific and behavior-oriented and it should also address various procedural concerns on how RG practices can be implemented.
Indexed as
Identifiers
29383609What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.