Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29383525›Full record

Trial reportEuropean radiology2018

Contrast-enhanced cadaver-specific computed tomography in gross anatomy teaching.

Daniel Paech, Kerstin Klopries, Sara Doll, Ralph Nawrotzki, Heinz-Peter Schlemmer, Frederik L Giesel, Thomas Kuner

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in European radiology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. The current state of forensic imaging - perspectives.International journal of legal medicine · 2025
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Daniel PaechDepartment of Radiology, German Cancer Research Center, Im Neuenheimer Feld 280, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany. d.paech@dkfz.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5755-6833
Kerstin KlopriesDepartment of Radiology, German Cancer Research Center, Im Neuenheimer Feld 280, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany.
Sara DollInstitute of Anatomy and Cell Biology, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany.
Ralph NawrotzkiInstitute of Anatomy and Cell Biology, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany.
Heinz-Peter SchlemmerDepartment of Radiology, German Cancer Research Center, Im Neuenheimer Feld 280, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany.
Frederik L GieselDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.
Thomas KunerInstitute of Anatomy and Cell Biology, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany.
Heidelberg University · DEGerman Cancer Research Center · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo establish contrast-enhanced (CE) cadaver-specific post-mortem computed tomography (PMCT) in first-year gross anatomy teaching and quantitatively evaluate its learning benefit.

methods132 first-year medical students were included in this IRB-approved study and randomly assigned to an intervention group (n=59) provided with continuous access to CE and non-enhanced (NE) cadaver-specific PMCT-scans during the first-semester gross anatomy course, and a control group (n=73) that had only NE cadaver-specific PMCT data available. Four multiple-choice tests were carried out (15 questions each) subsequent to completion of the corresponding anatomy module: Head and neck anatomy, extremities, thorax, and abdomen. Median test results were compared in each module between the groups using the Wilcoxon rank-sum test. Additionally, participants of the intervention group answered a 15-item feedback-questionnaire.

resultsThe intervention group achieved significantly higher test scores in head and neck anatomy (median=12.0, IQR=10.0-13.0) versus the control group (median=10.5, IQR=9.0-12.0) (p<0.01). There were no significant differences in the comparison of other modules. CEPMCT was highly appreciated by undergraduate medical students.

conclusionsThe incorporation of contrast-enhanced cadaver-specific PMCT-scans in gross anatomy teaching was proven to be feasible in the framework of the medical curriculum and significantly improved the students' learning performance in head and neck anatomy. KEY POINTS: • Cadaver-specific contrast-enhanced post-mortem CT (CEPMCT) is feasible in the medical curriculum. • CEPMCT yields significantly improved learning performance in head and neck anatomy (p<0.01). • CEPMCT is highly appreciated by medical students and used in tutor- or self-guided modes.

Indexed as

TeachingAnatomyAutopsyCadaverClinical CompetenceContrast MediaCurriculumEducational MeasurementEducation, Medical, UndergraduateFeasibility StudiesHeadHumansLearningNeckProspective StudiesStudents, MedicalContrast MediaAnatomyAnatomy, cross-sectionalComputed tomography angiographyMedical educationPost-mortem examination

Identifiers

PMID29383525
OpenAlexW2785732624

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.