ReviewDer Pathologe2018
[Diagnostic and predictive molecular pathology of head and neck neoplasms].
Review in Der Pathologe, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Clinical experience with the diagnosis and treatment of middle ear adenomatous neuroendocrine tumors.American journal of translational research · 2026Article
- Multi-omics analysis of overexpressed tumor-associated proteins: gene expression, immunopeptide presentation, and antibody response in oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma, with a focus on cancer-testis antigens.Frontiers in immunology · 2024Article
- Comparing TIMP-1 and Hsp70 in Blood and Saliva as Potential Prognostic Markers in HNSCC.Biomedicines · 2022Article
- [Sinonasal tumors : News from the WHO with special reference to mesenchymal entities].Der Pathologe · 2018Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
As a result of some seminal observations as well as a consequence of increasing use of modern and innovative molecular diagnostic technologies, a variety of new genetic aberrations have been discovered in head and neck neoplasms of different anatomic locations and histogenetic origins. These advances resulted in the establishment of new molecularly defined disease entities. On the other hand, some of these new genetic biomarkers paved the way to potentially promising novel therapeutic opportunities. Diverse old (well known in other entities) and newly discovered translocations and gene fusions represent the leading subgroup of these genetic aberrations. They have been detected not only in malignant epithelial neoplasms (carcinomas) of the salivary glands, but also in carcinomas from other head and neck sites as well as diverse mesenchymal tumors. In addition to these gene fusions, several activating mutations (such as CTNNB1 in sinonasal glomangiopericytoma) as well as inactivating mutations or deletions (like SMARCB1 loss in sinonasal carcinomas) were detected as new molecular markers. In the present review we summarize the relevant molecular alterations in topographically and histopathologically distinct tumors of the head and neck region with emphasis on recently established molecular markers.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.