Trial reportWorld journal of urology2018
Prostatic injection of botulinum toxin is not inferior to optimized medical therapy in the management of lower urinary tract symptoms due to benign prostatic hyperplasia: results of a randomized clinical trial.
Trial report in World journal of urology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01275521 (Study of the Effectiveness and the Tolerance of Intraprostatic A-botulinic Toxin Injection, in the Treatment of Symptomatic Benign Prostate Hypertrophy.), which is not on this map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Study of the Effectiveness and the Tolerance of Intraprostatic A-botulinic Toxin Injection, in the Treatment of Symptomatic Benign Prostate Hypertrophy.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- Effects of Tamsulosin Combined With Solifenacin on Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms: Evidence From a Systematic Review, Meta-Analysis, and Trial Sequential Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2020Pooled it
- Neuroscience in prostate cancer.Prostate cancer and prostatic diseases · 2026Review
- [Botulinum toxin in male lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS): What can we expect?]Urologie (Heidelberg, Germany) · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors at 10 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveTo explore efficacy and safety of Botulinum Neurotoxin Type A (BoNT-A) prostatic injection in patients with lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) due to benign prostatic hyperperplasia. MATERIALS AND
methodsA phase 3 multicenter open-labeled study randomised patients to receive BoNT-A prostatic injection or optimized medical therapy. BoNT-A injection consisted in trans-rectal injections of 200 UI in the transitional zone of the prostate. Optimal medical therapy consisted in oral medication with any drug patented for LUTS. One month (M1) after randomisation patients in the BoNT-A group were asked to stop any medical therapy related to LUTS. The main judgment criterion was the IPSS score at M4. Per-protocol analysis was performed with a non-inferiority hypothesis (ΔIPSS < 3).
results127 patients were randomised to BoNT-A (n = 64) or medical therapy (n = 63). At randomisation mean IPSS was 16.9 ± 7.2 in the BoNT-A group vs 15.7 ± 7.3 in control. In the BoNT-A group, 44 patients (73.3%) could interrupt medical therapy for LUTS from M1 to M4. At M4, mean IPSS score was 12.0 ± 6.7 in the BoNT-A group vs 11.8 ± 6.9 in control. After adjustment for baseline IPSS, delta IPSS between groups was 0.01; 95% CI [- 2.14; 2.11] leading to accept the non-inferiority hypothesis.
conclusionsFour months after BoNT-A injection, most of the patients could interrupt LUTS-related medical treatments. In these patients, IPSS improvement was not inferior to optimized medical treatment, but the study design did not allow to conclude that this improvement was related with study drug rather than with sustained placebo effect.
trial registrationNCT01275521.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.