Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29382889›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2018

Proactive Locomotor Adjustments Are Specific to Perturbation Uncertainty in Below-Knee Prosthesis Users.

Matthew J Major, Chelsi K Serba, Xinlin Chen, Nicholas Reimold, Franklyn Ndubuisi-Obi, Keith E Gordon

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.

Matthew J MajorNorthwestern University Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Chicago, United States. matthew-major@northwestern.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2330-4619
Chelsi K SerbaNorthwestern University Department of Physical Therapy and Human Movement Sciences, Chicago, United States.
Xinlin ChenNorthwestern University Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Chicago, United States.
Nicholas ReimoldNorthwestern University Department of Physical Therapy and Human Movement Sciences, Chicago, United States.
Franklyn Ndubuisi-ObiNorthwestern University Department of Physical Therapy and Human Movement Sciences, Chicago, United States.
Keith E GordonNorthwestern University Department of Physical Therapy and Human Movement Sciences, Chicago, United States.
Northwestern University · US

Funding

Northwestern University Clinical and Translational Science Institute (NUCATS)UL1TR001422 · NCATS · NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY AT CHICAGO · PI D'AQUILA, RICHARD · 2015 to 2023
$56.8M
Robotic Interventions to Enhance Locomotor Stability Following Spinal Cord InjuryIK2RX000717 · VA · EDWARD HINES JR VA HOSPITAL · PI GORDON, KEITH EDWARD · 2012 to 2015
–
Sensory-Motor Mechanisms Underlying Fall Risk in Transtibial AmputeesIK2RX001322 · VA · JESSE BROWN VA MEDICAL CENTER · PI MAJOR, MATTHEW J. · 2015 to 2020
–
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001422RRD VA IK2 RX000717RRD VA IK2 RX001322
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Sensory-motor deficits associated with below-knee amputation impair reactions to external perturbations. As such, below-knee prosthesis users rely on proactive control strategies to maintain locomotor stability. However, there are trade-offs (metabolic, comfort, etc.) associated with proactive strategies. We hypothesize that because proactive control strategies are costly, prosthesis users and non-impaired participants will use a priori knowledge (timing, direction) of an impending lateral perturbation to make specific gait adaptations only when the timing of the perturbation is known and the adaptation can be temporally-limited. This hypothesis was partially supported. When the perturbation timing was predictable, only prosthesis users, and only on their impaired side, increased their lateral margin of stability during the steps immediately preceding the perturbation when perturbation direction was either unknown or known to be directed towards their impaired side. This strategy should reduce the likelihood of requiring a corrective step to maintain stability. However, neither group exhibited substantial proactive adaptations compared to baseline walking when perturbation timing was unpredictable, independent of perturbation direction knowledge. The absence of further proactive stabilization behaviors observed in prosthesis users in anticipation of a certain but temporally unpredictable perturbation may be partially responsible for impaired balance control.

Indexed as

Adaptation, PhysiologicalKnee ProsthesisAdolescentAdultAgedArtificial LimbsBiomechanical PhenomenaFemaleGaitHumansLocomotionMaleMiddle AgedPostural BalanceWalkingYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID29382889
PMCPMC5789867
OpenAlexW2807394984

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.