Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29382868›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2018

Error-Gated Hebbian Rule: A Local Learning Rule for Principal and Independent Component Analysis.

Takuya Isomura, Taro Toyoizumi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Adaptive control of synaptic plasticity integrates micro- and macroscopic network function.Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2023
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Feature alignment as a generative process.Frontiers in artificial intelligence · 2022
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. A Measure of Information Available for Inference.Entropy (Basel, Switzerland) · 2018
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Takuya IsomuraLaboratory for Neural Computation and Adaptation, RIKEN Brain Science Institute, 2-1 Hirosawa, Wako, Saitama, 351-0198, Japan. takuya.isomura@riken.jp.
Taro ToyoizumiLaboratory for Neural Computation and Adaptation, RIKEN Brain Science Institute, 2-1 Hirosawa, Wako, Saitama, 351-0198, Japan. taro.toyoizumi@brain.riken.jp.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We developed a biologically plausible unsupervised learning algorithm, error-gated Hebbian rule (EGHR)-β, that performs principal component analysis (PCA) and independent component analysis (ICA) in a single-layer feedforward neural network. If parameter β = 1, it can extract the subspace that major principal components span similarly to Oja's subspace rule for PCA. If β = 0, it can separate independent sources similarly to Bell-Sejnowski's ICA rule but without requiring the same number of input and output neurons. Unlike these engineering rules, the EGHR-β can be easily implemented in a biological or neuromorphic circuit because it only uses local information available at each synapse. We analytically and numerically demonstrate the reliability of the EGHR-β in extracting and separating major sources given high-dimensional input. By adjusting β, the EGHR-β can extract sources that are missed by the conventional engineering approach that first applies PCA and then ICA. Namely, the proposed rule can successfully extract hidden natural images even in the presence of dominant or non-Gaussian noise components. The results highlight the reliability and utility of the EGHR-β for large-scale parallel computation of PCA and ICA and its future implementation in a neuromorphic hardware.

Identifiers

PMID29382868
PMCPMC5789861

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.