Observational studyScientific reports2018
Changes in Distribution of Dry Eye Disease by the New 2016 Diagnostic Criteria from the Asia Dry Eye Society.
Observational study in Scientific reports, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 24 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
24 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Prevalence and characteristics of dry eye disease in Parkinson's disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Scientific reports · 2022Pooled it
- Effect of Preserved Versus Preservative-Free Artificial Tears on the Corneal Epithelial Thickness Mapping by MS-39 in Dry Eye Patients.Journal of ophthalmology · 2026Article
- Relationship between dry eye disease and myopia: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Heliyon · 2024Article
- Ocular complications in adults with psoriasis: a cross-sectional study in a referral center in Brazil.International ophthalmology · 2024Article
- A Medical Paradigm Shift in Society 5.0: Implementation of a Smartphone App-based Dry Eye Diagnosis Assistance Software as a Medical Device.Juntendo Iji zasshi = Juntendo medical journal · 2024Article
- Symptom-based stratification algorithm for heterogeneous symptoms of dry eye disease: a feasibility study.Eye (London, England) · 2023Article
- Clinical utility of maximum blink interval measured by smartphone application DryEyeRhythm to support dry eye disease diagnosis.Scientific reports · 2023Observational
- Smartphone App-Based and Paper-Based Patient-Reported Outcomes Using a Disease-Specific Questionnaire for Dry Eye Disease: Randomized Crossover Equivalence Study.Journal of medical Internet research · 2023Article
- Diagnostic Ability of a Smartphone App for Dry Eye Disease: Protocol for a Multicenter, Open-Label, Prospective, and Cross-sectional Study.JMIR research protocols · 2023Article
- P4 Medicine for Heterogeneity of Dry Eye: A Mobile Health-based Digital Cohort Study.Juntendo Iji zasshi = Juntendo medical journal · 2023Review
- Prevalence and Characteristics of Dry Eye Disease After Cataract Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Ophthalmology and therapy · 2022Review
- Prevalence of Comorbidity between Dry Eye and Allergic Conjunctivitis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Journal of clinical medicine · 2022Review
- Application of Animal Models in Interpreting Dry Eye Disease.Frontiers in medicine · 2022Review
- Smartphone-based digital phenotyping for dry eye toward P4 medicine: a crowdsourced cross-sectional study.NPJ digital medicine · 2021Article
- A multicenter cross-sectional survey of dry eye clinical characteristics and practice patterns in Korea: the DECS-K study.Japanese journal of ophthalmology · 2021Observational
- Heterogeneity of eye drop use among symptomatic dry eye individuals in Japan: large-scale crowdsourced research using DryEyeRhythm application.Japanese journal of ophthalmology · 2021Observational
- Diagnostic ability of maximum blink interval together with Japanese version of Ocular Surface Disease Index score for dry eye disease.Scientific reports · 2020Observational
- A Review of Dry Eye Questionnaires: Measuring Patient-Reported Outcomes and Health-Related Quality of Life.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020Review
- Stratification of Individual Symptoms of Contact Lens-Associated Dry Eye Using the iPhone App DryEyeRhythm: Crowdsourced Cross-Sectional Study.Journal of medical Internet research · 2020Article
- Comparing the Japanese Version of the Ocular Surface Disease Index and Dry Eye-Related Quality-of-Life Score for Dry Eye Symptom Assessment.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Dry eye disease (DED) is a disorder of the tear film. Here, we delineate the changes in distribution of DED after diagnostic criteria changes from the 2006 Japanese Diagnostic Criteria to the 2016 Asia Dry Eye Society criteria. We included 250 right eyes of 250 patients and all patients completed ophthalmic assessments for DED. The 2006 criteria classified patients into definite DED, probable DED, and non-DED based on subjective symptoms, tear function, and/or vital staining. The 2016 criteria eliminated probable DED and classified patients into definite DED or non-DED based on subjective symptoms and decreased tear break-up time. We examined how probable DED patients were reclassified by the 2016 criteria. By the 2006 criteria, 38.8% (97/250) of patients had definite DED, 35.6% (89/250) had probable DED, and 25.6% (64/250) had non-DED. By the 2016 criteria, 66.8% (167/250) had definite DED and 31.2% (83/250) had non-DED. Among patients with probable DED using the 2006 criteria, 79.8% (71/89) were reclassified as definite DED and 20.2% (18/89) were reclassified as non-DED using the 2016 criteria. Our data revealed that prevalence of definite DED increased because most probable DED patients were reclassified as definite DED after changes in the diagnostic criteria.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.