Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29382856›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2018

Dynamic cellular phynotyping defines specific mobilization mechanisms of human hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells induced by SDF1α versus synthetic agents.

Cornelia Monzel, Alexandra S Becker, Rainer Saffrich, Patrick Wuchter, Volker Eckstein, Anthony D Ho, Motomu Tanaka

Erratum issuedOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 30% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Closer to Nature: The Role of MSCs in Recreating the Microenvironment of the Hematopoietic Stem Cell Niche in vitro.Transfusion medicine and hemotherapy : offizielles Organ der Deutschen Gesellschaft fur Transfusionsmedizin und Immunhamatologie · 2022
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Cornelia MonzelPhysical Chemistry of Biosystems, Institute of Physical Chemistry, Heidelberg University, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany.
Alexandra S BeckerPhysical Chemistry of Biosystems, Institute of Physical Chemistry, Heidelberg University, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany.
Rainer SaffrichDepartment of Medicine V, Heidelberg University, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0547-4550
Patrick WuchterDepartment of Medicine V, Heidelberg University, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany.
Volker EcksteinDepartment of Medicine V, Heidelberg University, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany.
Anthony D HoDepartment of Medicine V, Heidelberg University, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany. anthony_dick.ho@urz.uni-heidelberg.de.
Motomu TanakaPhysical Chemistry of Biosystems, Institute of Physical Chemistry, Heidelberg University, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany. tanaka@uni-heidelberg.de.
Heidelberg University · DECentre National de la Recherche Scientifique · FRKyoto University · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Efficient mobilization of hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells (HSPC) is one of the most crucial issues for harvesting an adequate amount of peripheral HSPC for successful clinical transplantation. Applying well-defined surrogate models for the bone marrow niche, live cell imaging techniques, and novel tools in statistical physics, we have quantified the functionality of two mobilization agents that have been applied in the clinic, NOX-A12 and AMD3100 (plerixafor), as compared to a naturally occurring chemokine in the bone marrow, SDF1α. We found that NOX-A12, an L-enantiomeric RNA oligonucleotide to SDF1, significantly reduced the adhesion of HSPC to the niche surface mediated via the CXCR4-SDF1α axis, and stretched the migration trajectories of the HSPC. We found that the stretching of trajectories by NOX-A12 was more prominent than that by SDF1α. In contrast, plerixafor exhibited no detectable interference with adhesion and migration. We also found that the deformation of HSPC induced by SDF1α or plerixafor was also drastically suppressed in the presence of NOX-A12. This novel technology of quantitative assessment of "dynamic phenotypes" by physical tools has therefore enabled us to define different mechanisms of function for various extrinsic factors compared to naturally occurring chemokines.

Indexed as

BenzylaminesBone MarrowBone Marrow CellsCell MovementCells, CulturedChemokine CXCL12ChemokinesCyclamsHematopoietic Stem Cell MobilizationHematopoietic Stem CellsHeterocyclic CompoundsHumansReceptors, CXCR4Stem Cell NicheStem CellsBenzylaminesChemokine CXCL12ChemokinesCyclamsHeterocyclic CompoundsplerixaforReceptors, CXCR4

Identifiers

PMID29382856
PMCPMC5789976
OpenAlexW2806264342

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.