ArticleNature communications2018
Publisher Correction: Ticks parasitised feathered dinosaurs as revealed by Cretaceous amber assemblages.
Article in Nature communications, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Interaction between spiders and ticks-ancient arthropod predatory behavior?Parasitology research · 2024Article
- Article
- Survey of tick species and molecular detection of selected tick-borne pathogens in Yanbian, China.Parasite (Paris, France) · 2022Article
- Large-scale countrywide screening for tick-borne pathogens in field-collected ticks in Latvia during 2017-2019.Parasites & vectors · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum for
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The originally published version of this Article was updated shortly after publication to add the word 'Ticks' to the title, following its inadvertent removal during the production process. This has now been corrected in both the PDF and HTML versions of the Article.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.