Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29382820›Full record

ArticleNature communications2018

Similar neural responses predict friendship.

Carolyn Parkinson, Adam M Kleinbaum, Thalia Wheatley

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 131 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
131citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

131 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Dyadic Person Similarity Predicts Similarity in Face Judgements.Quarterly journal of experimental psychology (2006) · 2026
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. The roles of emotional responding and regulation in adolescent friendship stability: A multimethod functional magnetic resonance imaging study.Journal of research on adolescence : the official journal of the Society for Research on Adolescence · 2026
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Neural predictors of hidden, persistent psychological states at work.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article

71 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Carolyn ParkinsonDepartment of Psychology, University of California, Los Angeles, 1285 Franz Hall, Box 951563, Los Angeles, CA, 90095, USA. cparkinson@ucla.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7128-3480
Adam M KleinbaumTuck School of Business, Dartmouth College, 100 Tuck Hall, Hanover, NH, 03755, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3654-2154
Thalia WheatleyDepartment of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Dartmouth College, 6207 Moore Hall, Hanover, NH, 03755, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Human social networks are overwhelmingly homophilous: individuals tend to befriend others who are similar to them in terms of a range of physical attributes (e.g., age, gender). Do similarities among friends reflect deeper similarities in how we perceive, interpret, and respond to the world? To test whether friendship, and more generally, social network proximity, is associated with increased similarity of real-time mental responding, we used functional magnetic resonance imaging to scan subjects' brains during free viewing of naturalistic movies. Here we show evidence for neural homophily: neural responses when viewing audiovisual movies are exceptionally similar among friends, and that similarity decreases with increasing distance in a real-world social network. These results suggest that we are exceptionally similar to our friends in how we perceive and respond to the world around us, which has implications for interpersonal influence and attraction.

Indexed as

Interpersonal RelationsAdolescentAdultBrainFemaleFriendsHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleSocial Networking

Identifiers

PMID29382820
PMCPMC5790806

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.