Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29382816›Full record

ArticleNature communications2018

A carbon nanotube tape for serial-section electron microscopy of brain ultrastructure.

Yoshiyuki Kubota, Jaerin Sohn, Sayuri Hatada, Meike Schurr, Jakob Straehle, Anjali Gour, Ralph Neujahr, Takafumi Miki, Shawn Mikula, Yasuo Kawaguchi

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 37 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
37citing papers in PubMed
8.4field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

37 citing papers in PubMed, 81 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Photoemission electron microscopy for connectomics.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  4. Learning and Control in Motor Cortex across Cell Types and Scales.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2024
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Frontiers in neural circuits · 2022
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 7 institutions in 2 countries.

Yoshiyuki KubotaDivision of Cerebral Circuitry, National Institute for Physiological Sciences, 5-1 Myodaiji-Higashiyama, Okazaki, Aichi, 444-8787, Japan. yoshiy@nips.ac.jp.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0950-7460
Jaerin SohnDivision of Cerebral Circuitry, National Institute for Physiological Sciences, 5-1 Myodaiji-Higashiyama, Okazaki, Aichi, 444-8787, Japan.
Sayuri HatadaDivision of Cerebral Circuitry, National Institute for Physiological Sciences, 5-1 Myodaiji-Higashiyama, Okazaki, Aichi, 444-8787, Japan.
Meike SchurrDepartment of Connectomics, Max-Planck Institute for Brain Research, Max-von-Laue-Str. 4, D-60438, Frankfurt, Germany.
Jakob StraehleDepartment of Connectomics, Max-Planck Institute for Brain Research, Max-von-Laue-Str. 4, D-60438, Frankfurt, Germany.
Anjali GourDepartment of Connectomics, Max-Planck Institute for Brain Research, Max-von-Laue-Str. 4, D-60438, Frankfurt, Germany.
Ralph NeujahrCarl Zeiss Microscopy GmbH, ZEISS Microscopy Customer Center Europe, Rudolph-Eber-Str. 2, D- 873447, Oberkochen, Germany.
Takafumi MikiGraduate School of Brain Science, Doshisha University, 1-3 Tatara Miyakodani, Kyotanabe, Kyoto, 610-0394, Japan.
Shawn MikulaElectrons-Photons-Neurons, Max-Planck Institute of Neurobiology, Am Klopferspitz 18, D-82152, Martinsried, Germany.
Yasuo KawaguchiDivision of Cerebral Circuitry, National Institute for Physiological Sciences, 5-1 Myodaiji-Higashiyama, Okazaki, Aichi, 444-8787, Japan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7483-8362
Max Planck Institute for Brain Research · DEThe Graduate University for Advanced Studies, SOKENDAI · JPCarl Zeiss (Germany) · DEDoshisha University · JPJapan Society for the Promotion of Science · JPMax Planck Institute of Neurobiology · DENational Institute for Physiological Sciences · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Automated tape-collecting ultramicrotomy in conjunction with scanning electron microscopy (SEM) is a powerful approach for volume electron microscopy and three-dimensional neuronal circuit analysis. Current tapes are limited by section wrinkle formation, surface scratches and sample charging during imaging. Here we show that a plasma-hydrophilized carbon nanotube (CNT)-coated polyethylene terephthalate (PET) tape effectively resolves these issues and produces SEM images of comparable quality to those from transmission electron microscopy. CNT tape can withstand multiple rounds of imaging, offer low surface resistance across the entire tape length and generate no wrinkles during the collection of ultrathin sections. When combined with an enhanced en bloc staining protocol, CNT tape-processed brain sections reveal detailed synaptic ultrastructure. In addition, CNT tape is compatible with post-embedding immunostaining for light and electron microscopy. We conclude that CNT tape can enable high-resolution volume electron microscopy for brain ultrastructure analysis.

Indexed as

Nanotubes, CarbonAnimalsBrainMaleMiceMicroscopy, Electron, ScanningMicrotomyPolyethylene TerephthalatesRats, WistarNanotubes, CarbonPolyethylene Terephthalates

Identifiers

PMID29382816
PMCPMC5789869
OpenAlexW2789207897

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.