Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29382633›Full record

ArticleJournal of medical Internet research2018

Prediction of Incident Hypertension Within the Next Year: Prospective Study Using Statewide Electronic Health Records and Machine Learning.

Chengyin Ye, Tianyun Fu, Shiying Hao, Yan Zhang, Oliver Wang, Bo Jin, Minjie Xia, Modi Liu, Xin Zhou, Qian Wu and 10 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of medical Internet research, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 114 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
114citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

114 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Robust privacy amidst innovation with large language models through a critical assessment of the risks.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2025
    Article
  20. Article

54 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

20 authors.

Chengyin Ye *Department of Health Management, Hangzhou Normal University, Hangzhou, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8384-1857
Tianyun Fu *HBI Solutions Inc, Palo Alto, CA, United States.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8103-8841
Shiying Hao *Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, United States.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7527-2460
Yan ZhangDepartment of Oncology, The First Hospital of Shijiazhuang, Shijiazhuang, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2198-5393
Oliver WangHBI Solutions Inc, Palo Alto, CA, United States.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6240-1342
Bo JinHBI Solutions Inc, Palo Alto, CA, United States.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9268-7134
Minjie XiaHBI Solutions Inc, Palo Alto, CA, United States.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0367-1729
Modi LiuHBI Solutions Inc, Palo Alto, CA, United States.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8066-3351
Xin ZhouTianjin Key Laboratory of Cardiovascular Remodeling and Target Organ Injury, Pingjin Hospital Heart Center, Tianjin, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1395-7103
Qian WuChina Electric Power Research Institute, Beijing, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9253-5322
Yanting GuoDepartment of Surgery, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, United States.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4972-4427
Chunqing ZhuHBI Solutions Inc, Palo Alto, CA, United States.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0649-4403
Yu-Ming LiTianjin Key Laboratory of Cardiovascular Remodeling and Target Organ Injury, Pingjin Hospital Heart Center, Tianjin, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1981-8120
Devore S CulverHealthInfoNet, Portland, ME, United States.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5826-2079
Shaun T AlfredsHealthInfoNet, Portland, ME, United States.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1752-4823
Frank StearnsHBI Solutions Inc, Palo Alto, CA, United States.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2049-9163
Karl G SylvesterDepartment of Surgery, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, United States.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8559-0155
Eric WidenHBI Solutions Inc, Palo Alto, CA, United States.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8999-4659
Doff McElhinney *Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, United States.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7242-0934
Xuefeng Ling *Department of Surgery, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, United States.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5386-3884

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAs a high-prevalence health condition, hypertension is clinically costly, difficult to manage, and often leads to severe and life-threatening diseases such as cardiovascular disease (CVD) and stroke.

objectiveThe aim of this study was to develop and validate prospectively a risk prediction model of incident essential hypertension within the following year.

methodsData from individual patient electronic health records (EHRs) were extracted from the Maine Health Information Exchange network. Retrospective (N=823,627, calendar year 2013) and prospective (N=680,810, calendar year 2014) cohorts were formed. A machine learning algorithm, XGBoost, was adopted in the process of feature selection and model building. It generated an ensemble of classification trees and assigned a final predictive risk score to each individual.

resultsThe 1-year incident hypertension risk model attained areas under the curve (AUCs) of 0.917 and 0.870 in the retrospective and prospective cohorts, respectively. Risk scores were calculated and stratified into five risk categories, with 4526 out of 381,544 patients (1.19%) in the lowest risk category (score 0-0.05) and 21,050 out of 41,329 patients (50.93%) in the highest risk category (score 0.4-1) receiving a diagnosis of incident hypertension in the following 1 year. Type 2 diabetes, lipid disorders, CVDs, mental illness, clinical utilization indicators, and socioeconomic determinants were recognized as driving or associated features of incident essential hypertension. The very high risk population mainly comprised elderly (age>50 years) individuals with multiple chronic conditions, especially those receiving medications for mental disorders. Disparities were also found in social determinants, including some community-level factors associated with higher risk and others that were protective against hypertension.

conclusionsWith statewide EHR datasets, our study prospectively validated an accurate 1-year risk prediction model for incident essential hypertension. Our real-time predictive analytic model has been deployed in the state of Maine, providing implications in interventions for hypertension and related diseases and hopefully enhancing hypertension care.

Indexed as

AgedCohort StudiesElectronic Health RecordsFemaleHumansHypertensionMachine LearningMaleMiddle AgedProspective StudiesRetrospective StudiesRisk Factorselectronic health recordshypertensionmental disordersmultiple chronic conditionsrisk assessmentsocial determinants of health

Identifiers

PMID29382633
PMCPMC5811646

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.