Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29382458›Full record

ArticleCanadian Urological Association journal = Journal de l'Association des urologues du Canada2017

Widespread use of internet, applications, and social media in the professional life of urology residents.

Johannes Salem, Hendrik Borgmann, Martin Baunacke, Katharina Boehm, Julian Hanske, Andrew Macneily, Christian Meyer, Tim Nestler, Marianne Schmid, Johannes Huber

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Canadian Urological Association journal = Journal de l'Association des urologues du Canada, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. A new wave of urologists? Graduating urology residents' practices of and attitudes toward social media.Canadian Urological Association journal = Journal de l'Association des urologues du Canada · 2018
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Johannes SalemDepartment of Urology, University Hospital Cologne, Kerpener Straße, Cologne, Germany.
Hendrik BorgmannDepartment of Urology, University Medicine, Mainz, Germany.
Martin BaunackeDepartment of Urology, Medical Faculty Carl Gustav Carus, TU Dresden, Dresden, Germany.
Katharina BoehmUniversity Medical Centre Hamburg-Eppendorf, Germany.
Julian HanskeDepartment of Urology, Marien Hospital, Ruhr-University Bochum, Herne, Germany.
Andrew MacneilyDepartment of Urologic Sciences, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Christian MeyerUniversity Medical Centre Hamburg-Eppendorf, Germany.
Tim NestlerDepartment of Urology, Federal Armed Forces Hospital Koblenz, Koblenz, Germany.
Marianne SchmidDepartment of Urology, University Medical Centre Goettingen, Goettingen, Germany.
Johannes HuberDepartment of Urology, Medical Faculty Carl Gustav Carus, TU Dresden, Dresden, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionDigital media have revolutionized communication and information dissemination in healthcare. We aimed to quantify and evaluate professional digital media use among urology residents.

methodsWe designed a 17-item survey to assess usage and perceived usefulness of digital media, as well as communication type and device type and distributed it via email to 143 Canadian and 721 German urology residents.

resultsIn total, 58 (41% response rate) residents from Canada and 170 (24% response rate) from Germany reported professional usage rates of 100% on the internet, 89% on apps, and 46% on social media (SoMe). For professional use, residents spent a median of 30 minutes per day on the internet, 10 minutes on apps, and 15 minutes on SoMe. 100% rated the internet, 89% apps, and 31% SoMe as useful for clinical practice. Most (94%) used digital media for communication with colleagues and 23% for communication with patients. Digital media use was allocated to desktop computers (55%) and mobile devices (45%). Canadian residents had higher usage rates of apps (96% vs. 86%; p=0.042) and SoMe (65% vs. 39%; p=0.002) and longer daily usage times for the internet, apps, and SoMe than German residents (p<0.001 each).

conclusionsDigital media are an integral part of the daily professional practice of urology residents, reflected by high usage rates and perceived usefulness of the internet and apps, and the growing importance of SoMe. Urologists should strive to progressively exhaust the vast potential of digital media for academic and clinical practice.

Identifiers

PMID29382458
PMCPMC5798440

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.