Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29382363›Full record

ArticleParasites & vectors2018

Identifying co-endemic areas for major filarial infections in sub-Saharan Africa: seeking synergies and preventing severe adverse events during mass drug administration campaigns.

Jorge Cano, Maria-Gloria Basáñez, Simon J O'Hanlon, Afework H Tekle, Samuel Wanji, Honorat G Zouré, Maria P Rebollo, Rachel L Pullan

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Parasites & vectors, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 42 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Observational
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Projected Number of People With Onchocerciasis-Loiasis Coinfection in Africa, 1995 to 2025.Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America · 2020
    Article
  20. A Test-and-Not-Treat Strategy for Onchocerciasis Elimination in Loa loa-coendemic Areas: Cost Analysis of a Pilot in the Soa Health District, Cameroon.Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Jorge CanoDepartment of Disease Control, Faculty of Infectious & Tropical Diseases, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK. jorge.cano@lshtm.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0001-9864-5058
Maria-Gloria BasáñezLondon Centre for Neglected Tropical Disease Research, Department of Infectious Disease Epidemiology, School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine (St Mary's campus), Imperial College London, London, UK.
Simon J O'HanlonLondon Centre for Neglected Tropical Disease Research, Department of Infectious Disease Epidemiology, School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine (St Mary's campus), Imperial College London, London, UK.
Afework H TekleResearch Foundation in Tropical Medicine and the Environment, Buea, Cameroon.
Samuel WanjiDepartment of Biochemistry and Microbiology, University of Buea, P.O. Box 63, Buea, Cameroon.
Honorat G ZouréFormer African Programme for Onchocerciasis Control Programme, Ouagadougou, Burkina Faso.
Maria P RebolloExpanded Special Programme for Elimination of Neglected Tropical Diseases (ESPEN), Brazzaville, Republic of Congo.
Rachel L PullanDepartment of Disease Control, Faculty of Infectious & Tropical Diseases, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK.
London Centre for Neglected Tropical Disease Research · GBLondon School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine · GBPan African Tsetse and Trypanosomiasis Eradication Campaign · BFUniversity of Buea · CM

Funding

Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation OPP 1033751
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundOnchocerciasis and lymphatic filariasis (LF) are major filarial infections targeted for elimination in most endemic sub-Saharan Africa (SSA) countries by 2020/2025. The current control strategies are built upon community-directed mass administration of ivermectin (CDTI) for onchocerciasis, and ivermectin plus albendazole for LF, with evidence pointing towards the potential for novel drug regimens. When distributing microfilaricides however, considerable care is needed to minimise the risk of severe adverse events (SAEs) in areas that are co-endemic for onchocerciasis or LF and loiasis. This work aims to combine previously published predictive risk maps for onchocerciasis, LF and loiasis to (i) explore the scale of spatial heterogeneity in co-distributions, (ii) delineate target populations for different treatment strategies, and (iii) quantify populations at risk of SAEs across the continent.

methodsGeographical co-endemicity of filarial infections prior to the implementation of large-scale mass treatment interventions was analysed by combining a contemporary LF endemicity map with predictive prevalence maps of onchocerciasis and loiasis. Potential treatment strategies were geographically delineated according to the level of co-endemicity and estimated transmission intensity.

resultsIn total, an estimated 251 million people live in areas of LF and/or onchocerciasis transmission in SSA, based on 2015 population estimates. Of these, 96 million live in areas co-endemic for both LF and onchocerciasis, providing opportunities for integrated control programmes, and 83 million live in LF-monoendemic areas potentially targetable for the novel ivermectin-diethylcarbamazine-albendazole (IDA) triple therapy. Only 4% of the at-risk population live in areas co-endemic with high loiasis transmission, representing up to 1.2 million individuals at high risk of experiencing SAEs if treated with ivermectin. In these areas, alternative treatment strategies should be explored, including biannual albendazole monotherapy for LF (1.4 million individuals) and 'test-and-treat' strategies (8.7 million individuals) for onchocerciasis.

conclusionsThese maps are intended to initiate discussion around the potential for tailored treatment strategies, and highlight populations at risk of SAEs. Further work is required to test and refine strategies in programmatic settings, providing the empirical evidence needed to guide efforts towards the 2020/2025 goals and beyond.

Indexed as

Africa South of the SaharaAlbendazoleAnimalsDiethylcarbamazineDrug SynergismDrug Therapy, CombinationElephantiasis, FilarialFemaleFilaricidesHumansIvermectinLoiasisMaleMass Drug AdministrationOnchocercaOnchocerciasisAlbendazoleDiethylcarbamazineFilaricidesIvermectinAlbendazoleDECFilariasisGISIvermectinLoiasisLymphatic filariasisMappingOnchocerciasisSevere adverse events

Identifiers

PMID29382363
PMCPMC5791223
OpenAlexW2785701441

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.