SynthesisBMC health services research2018
A systematic review of care management interventions targeting multimorbidity and high care utilization.
Synthesis in BMC health services research, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 40 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
40 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Community care navigation intervention for people who are at risk of unplanned hospital presentations.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2025Pooled it
- Examining nursing processes in primary care settings using the Chronic Care Model: an umbrella review.BMC primary care · 2023Pooled it
- Case management interventions in chronic disease reduce anxiety and depressive symptoms: A systematic review and meta-analysis.PloS one · 2023Pooled it
- Prediction Models for Future High-Need High-Cost Healthcare Use: a Systematic Review.Journal of general internal medicine · 2022Pooled it
- Rethinking Integrated Care: A Systematic Hermeneutic Review of the Literature on Integrated Care Strategies and Concepts.The Milbank quarterly · 2020Pooled it
- The effectiveness of care coordination on medication adherence among high-need, high-cost commercially insured beneficiaries: A randomized controlled trial.Journal of managed care & specialty pharmacy · 2026Trial
- Care Coordination for High-Need, High-Cost Commercially Insured Patients: A Randomized Clinical Trial.JAMA network open · 2025Trial
- Patient Activation, Depressive Symptoms, and Self-Rated Health: Care Management Intervention Effects among High-Need, Medically Complex Adults.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021Trial
- Association of cardiovascular-kidney-metabolic syndrome with blinding eye diseases: insights from a UK Biobank cohort analysis.Eye (London, England) · 2026Article
- Exploring Patient Perspectives on the Use of Artificial Intelligence to Inform Joint Decision-Making for Patients With Multiple Conditions in Primary Care in the United Kingdom: Qualitative Study.Journal of medical Internet research · 2026Article
- What makes patients in primary care complex? A scoping review combined with a focus group analysis.Scandinavian journal of primary health care · 2025Article
- Article
- "The start of something that I hope could be greater": Health information technology tools for social care.SSM. Qualitative research in health · 2025Article
- Caring for high-need patients.BMC health services research · 2023Article
- Article
- Fragmentation, dehumanization, commodification: crisis of medicine.Croatian medical journal · 2023Article
- User-centred design for machine learning in health care: a case study from care management.BMJ health & care informatics · 2022Article
- Care Coordination Models and Tools-Systematic Review and Key Informant Interviews.Journal of general internal medicine · 2022Article
- Care Management of Comorbid Medical and Psychiatric Illness: A Conceptual Framework for Improving Equity of Care.Population health management · 2022Review
- Self-management support in flemish primary care practice: the development of a preliminary conceptual model using a qualitative approach.BMC primary care · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundEvidence supporting the effectiveness of care management programs for complex patients has been inconclusive. However, past reviews have not focused on complexity primarily defined by multimorbidity and healthcare utilization. We conducted a systematic review of care management interventions targeting the following three patient groups: adults with two or more chronic medical conditions, adults with at least one chronic medical condition and concurrent depression, and adults identified based solely on high past or predicted healthcare utilization.
methodsEligible studies were identified from PubMed, published between 06/01/2005 and 05/31/2015, and reported findings from a randomized intervention that tested a comprehensive, care management intervention. Identified interventions were grouped based on the three "complex" categories of interest (described above). Two investigators extracted data using a structured abstraction form and assessed RCT quality.
resultsWe screened 989 article titles for eligibility from which 847 were excluded. After reviewing the remaining 142 abstracts, 83 articles were excluded. We reviewed the full-text of 59 full-text articles and identified 15 unique RCTs for the final analysis. Of these 15 studies, two focused on patients with two or more chronic medical conditions, seven on patients with at least one chronic medical condition and depression, and six on patients with high past or predicted healthcare utilization. Measured outcomes included utilization, chronic disease measures, and patient-reported outcomes. The seven studies targeting patients with at least one chronic medical condition and depression demonstrated significant improvement in depression symptoms (ranging from 9.2 to 48.7% improvement). Of the six studies that focused on high utilizers, two showed small reductions in utilization. The quality of the research methodology in most of the studies (12/15) was rated fair or poor.
conclusionsInterventions were more likely to be successful when patients were selected based on having at least one chronic medical condition and concurrent depression, and when patient-reported outcomes were assessed. Future research should focus on the role of mental health in complex care management, finding better methods for identifying patients who would benefit most from care management, and determining which intervention components are needed for which patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.