ArticleBMC genomics2018
Genomic prediction using DArT-Seq technology for yellowtail kingfish Seriola lalandi.
Article in BMC genomics, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
22 citing papers in PubMed.
- Development and Applications of a 1K SNP Panel for Whiteleg Shrimp: From Pedigree Reconstruction to Genomic Selection.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Article
- A Shift to Metapopulation Genetic Management for Persistence of a Species Threatened by Fragmentation: The Case of an Endangered Australian Freshwater Fish.Molecular ecology · 2025Article
- Deep learning for genomic selection of aquatic animals.Marine life science & technology · 2024Review
- Planning and implementing genetic rescue of an endangered freshwater fish population in a regulated river, where low flow reduces breeding opportunities and may trigger inbreeding depression.Evolutionary applications · 2024Article
- Review
- Novel Alleles fromInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2024Article
- Article
- Effects of common full-sib families on accuracy of genomic prediction for tagging weight in striped catfishFrontiers in genetics · 2022Article
- Genomic Selection in Aquaculture Species.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2022Article
- Genomic prediction for testes weight of the tiger pufferfish, Takifugu rubripes, using medium to low density SNPs.Scientific reports · 2021Article
- Impact of genotypic errors with equal and unequal family contribution on accuracy of genomic prediction in aquaculture using simulation.Scientific reports · 2021Article
- Using multiple sources during reintroduction of a locally extinct population benefits survival and reproduction of an endangered freshwater fish.Evolutionary applications · 2021Article
- Prediction Accuracies of Genomic Selection for Nine Commercially Important Traits in the Portuguese Oyster (Genes · 2021Article
- Twelve quick steps for genome assembly and annotation in the classroom.PLoS computational biology · 2020Article
- Harnessing genomics to fast-track genetic improvement in aquaculture.Nature reviews. Genetics · 2020Review
- Article
- Genotyping by sequencing provides new insights into the diversity of Napier grass (Cenchrus purpureus) and reveals variation in genome-wide LD patterns between collections.Scientific reports · 2019Article
- Single Nucleotide Polymorphisms (SNPs) Reveal Sibship Among Founders of a Bangladeshi Rohu (Frontiers in genetics · 2019Article
- Genetic Connectivity of the Sky Emperor,Frontiers in genetics · 2019Article
- Genomic Tools and Selective Breeding in Molluscs.Frontiers in genetics · 2018Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundGenomic prediction using Diversity Arrays Technology (DArT) genotype by sequencing platform has not been reported in yellowtail kingfish (Seriola lalandi). The principal aim of this study was to address this knowledge gap and to assess predictive ability of genomic Best Linear Unbiased Prediction (gBLUP) for traits of commercial importance in a yellowtail kingfish population comprising 752 individuals that had DNA sequence and phenotypic records for growth traits (body weight, fork length and condition index). The gBLUP method was used due to its computational efficiency and it showed similar predictive performance to other approaches, especially for traits whose variation is of polygenic nature, such as body traits analysed in this study. The accuracy or predictive ability of the gBLUP model was estimated for three growth traits: body weight, folk length and condition index.
resultsThe prediction accuracy was moderate to high (0.44 to 0.69) for growth-related traits. The predictive ability for body weight increased by 17.0% (from 0.69 to 0.83) when missing genotype was imputed. Within population prediction using five-fold across validation approach showed that the gBLUP model performed well for growth traits (weight, length and condition factor), with the coefficient of determination (R
conclusionsCollectively our results demonstrated, for the first time in yellowtail kingfish, the potential application of genomic selection for growth-related traits in the future breeding program for this species, S. lalandi.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.