Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29382242›Full record

ReviewExpert opinion on drug discovery2018

Models of retinal diseases and their applicability in drug discovery.

Goldis Malek, Julia Busik, Maria B Grant, Mayur Choudhary

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Expert opinion on drug discovery, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
33citing papers in PubMed
4.1field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

33 citing papers in PubMed, 48 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Beyond VEGF: Targeting Inflammation and Other Pathways for Treatment of Retinal Disease.The Journal of pharmacology and experimental therapeutics · 2023
    Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Goldis Maleka Department of Ophthalmology , Duke University School of Medicine , Durham , NC , USA.
Julia Busikc Department of Physiology , Michigan State University , East Lansing , MI , USA.
Maria B Grantd Department of Ophthalmology , University of Alabama at Birmingham , Birmingham , Al , USA.
Mayur Choudharya Department of Ophthalmology , Duke University School of Medicine , Durham , NC , USA.
Duke University · USMichigan State University · USUniversity of Alabama at Birmingham · US

Funding

Regional Pilot And Feasibility Study Grants ProgramP30DK020572 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI Mehboob A Hussain · 2013 to 2026
$24.3M
VISION RESEARCHP30EY005722 · NEI · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI Vadim Y Arshavsky · 1985 to 2026
$19.3M
Dyslipidemia and Diabetic RetinopathyR01EY016077 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF OKLAHOMA HLTH SCIENCES CTR · PI BUSIK, JULIA V · 2005 to 2025
$6.3M
LXR as a Novel Therapeutic Target in Diabetic RetinopathyR01EY025383 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA AT BIRMINGHAM · PI BUSIK, JULIA V, GRANT, MARIA BARTOLOMEO · 2015 to 2024
$4.2M
Lipid Activated Nuclear Receptors in Age-Related Macular DegenerationR01EY020868 · NEI · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI MALEK, GOLDIS · 2011 to 2015
$1.8M
NEI NIH HHS P30 EY005722NEI NIH HHS R01 EY016077NEI NIH HHS R01 EY020868NEI NIH HHS R01 EY025383NIDDK NIH HHS P30 DK020572
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThe impact of vision debilitating diseases is a global public health concern, which will continue until effective preventative and management protocols are developed. Two retinal diseases responsible for the majority of vision loss in the working age adults and elderly populations are diabetic retinopathy (DR) and age-related macular degeneration (AMD), respectively. Model systems, which recapitulate aspects of human pathology, are valid experimental modalities that have contributed to the identification of signaling pathways involved in disease development and consequently potential therapies. Areas covered: The pathology of DR and AMD, which serve as the basis for designing appropriate models of disease, is discussed. The authors also review in vitro and in vivo models of DR and AMD and evaluate the utility of these models in exploratory and pre-clinical studies. Expert opinion: The complex nature of non-Mendelian diseases such as DR and AMD has made identification of effective therapeutic treatments challenging. However, the authors believe that while in vivo models are often criticized for not being a 'perfect' recapitulation of disease, they have been valuable experimentally when used with consideration of the strengths and limitations of the experimental model selected and have a place in the drug discovery process.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAnimalsDiabetic RetinopathyDisease Models, AnimalDrug DesignDrug DiscoveryHumansMacular DegenerationAge-related macular degenerationanimal modelscell culture modelsdiabetic retinopathy

Identifiers

PMID29382242
PMCPMC6192033
OpenAlexW2794100172

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.