Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29382070›Full record

ReviewInternational journal of molecular sciences2018

Human Microbiome Acquisition and Bioinformatic Challenges in Metagenomic Studies.

Valeria D'Argenio

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in International journal of molecular sciences, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. The Biological Role of Vitamins in Athletes' Muscle, Heart and Microbiota.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Recovery of microbial community profile information hidden in chimeric sequence reads.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2021
    Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Valeria D'ArgenioCEINGE-Biotecnologie Avanzate, via G. Salvatore 486, 80145 Naples, Italy. dargenio@ceinge.unina.it.ORCID 0000-0001-9273-3698

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The study of the human microbiome has become a very popular topic. Our microbial counterpart, in fact, appears to play an important role in human physiology and health maintenance. Accordingly, microbiome alterations have been reported in an increasing number of human diseases. Despite the huge amount of data produced to date, less is known on how a microbial dysbiosis effectively contributes to a specific pathology. To fill in this gap, other approaches for microbiome study, more comprehensive than 16S rRNA gene sequencing, i.e., shotgun metagenomics and metatranscriptomics, are becoming more widely used. Methods standardization and the development of specific pipelines for data analysis are required to contribute to and increase our understanding of the human microbiome relationship with health and disease status.

Indexed as

Gastrointestinal MicrobiomeMetagenomeGenomicsHumansTranscriptome16S rRNA analysisbioinformaticsdata analysishuman microbiomemetagenomicsmetrascriptomics

Identifiers

PMID29382070
PMCPMC5855605

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.