Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29382062›Full record

ArticlePharmacy (Basel, Switzerland)2018

Giving Voice to the Medically Under-Served: A Qualitative Co-Production Approach to Explore Patient Medicine Experiences and Improve Services to Marginalized Communities.

Asam Latif, Sana Tariq, Nasa Abbasi, Baguiasri Mandane

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Pharmacy (Basel, Switzerland), 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Coproducing COVID-19 Health Information Resources: A Participatory Study With Older Adults From Minoritised Ethnic Communities in the UK.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2025
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Consumer Involvement in the Design and Development of Medication Safety Interventions or Services in Primary Care: A Scoping Review.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2024
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Qualitative Methods in Pharmacy Research.Pharmacy (Basel, Switzerland) · 2018
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Community pharmacy Medicines Use Review: current challenges.Integrated pharmacy research & practice · 2017
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Asam LatifSchool of Health Sciences, University of Nottingham, Nottingham NG7 2RD, UK. asam.latif@nottingham.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0003-0730-7120
Sana TariqKarimia Ltd., Nottingham NG7 5JU, UK. sana@radiodawn.com.
Nasa AbbasiQueen's Pharmacy Centre, Nottingham NG8 5DB, UK. queenspharmacycentre@hotmail.com.
Baguiasri MandaneUniversity Hospitals of Leicester NHS Trust, Leicester LE1 5WW, UK. baguiasri.mandane@uhl-tr.nhs.uk.ORCID 0000-0003-0680-3691

Funding

Department of Health ICA-CL-2015-01-008
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWith an aging population, the appropriate, effective and safe use of medicines is a global health priority. However, "'medically under-served" patients continue to experience significant inequalities around access to healthcare services.

aimThis study forms part of a wider project to co-develop and evaluate a digital educational intervention for community pharmacy. The aim of this paper is to explore the medicine needs of patients from marginalized communities and suggest practical way on how services could be better tailored to their requirements.

methodFollowing ethical approval, qualitative data was gathered from: (1) workshops with patients and professionals (

resultsOur findings revealed that patients from marginalized communities reported poor management of their medical conditions and significant problems with adherence to prescribed medicines. Their experience of pharmacy services was found to be variable with many experiencing discrimination or disadvantage as a result of their status. DISCUSSION: This study highlights the plight of medically under-served communities and the need for policy makers to tailor services to an individual's needs and circumstances. Furthermore, patients and professionals can work in collaboration using a co-production approach to develop educational interventions for pharmacy service improvements.

Indexed as

adherenceco-productione-learningmedically under-servedmedicines use review (MUR)pharmacy

Identifiers

PMID29382062
PMCPMC5874552

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.