Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29382060›Full record

ArticleMolecules (Basel, Switzerland)2018

Predicting the Effect of Single and Multiple Mutations on Protein Structural Stability.

Ramin Dehghanpoor, Evan Ricks, Katie Hursh, Sarah Gunderson, Roshanak Farhoodi, Nurit Haspel, Brian Hutchinson, Filip Jagodzinski

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecules (Basel, Switzerland), 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 41 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. DiffBond: A Method for Predicting Intermolecular Bond Formation.Proceedings. IEEE International Conference on Bioinformatics and Biomedicine · 2021
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. PETRA: Drug Engineering via Rigidity Analysis.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Ramin DehghanpoorDepartment of Computer Science, University of Massachusetts Boston, Boston, MA 02125, USA. ramin.dehghanpoor001@umb.edu.
Evan RicksDepartment of Computer Science, Western Washington University, Bellingham, WA 98225, USA. rickse2@wwu.edu.
Katie HurshDepartment of Computer Science, Western Washington University, Bellingham, WA 98225, USA. hurshk@wwu.edu.
Sarah GundersonDepartment of Computer Science, Western Washington University, Bellingham, WA 98225, USA. gunders7@wwu.edu.
Roshanak FarhoodiDepartment of Computer Science, University of Massachusetts Boston, Boston, MA 02125, USA. rfarhoodi@gmail.com.
Nurit HaspelDepartment of Computer Science, University of Massachusetts Boston, Boston, MA 02125, USA. nurit.haspel@umb.edu.
Brian HutchinsonDepartment of Computer Science, Western Washington University, Bellingham, WA 98225, USA. Brian.Hutchinson@wwu.edu.
Filip JagodzinskiDepartment of Computer Science, Western Washington University, Bellingham, WA 98225, USA. filip.jagodzinski@wwu.edu.
Western Washington University · USUniversity of Massachusetts Boston · USRichland College · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Predicting how a point mutation alters a protein's stability can guide pharmaceutical drug design initiatives which aim to counter the effects of serious diseases. Conducting mutagenesis studies in physical proteins can give insights about the effects of amino acid substitutions, but such wet-lab work is prohibitive due to the time as well as financial resources needed to assess the effect of even a single amino acid substitution. Computational methods for predicting the effects of a mutation on a protein structure can complement wet-lab work, and varying approaches are available with promising accuracy rates. In this work we compare and assess the utility of several machine learning methods and their ability to predict the effects of single and double mutations. We in silico generate mutant protein structures, and compute several rigidity metrics for each of them. We use these as features for our Support Vector Regression (SVR), Random Forest (RF), and Deep Neural Network (DNN) methods. We validate the predictions of our in silico mutations against experimental Δ Δ G stability data, and attain Pearson Correlation values upwards of 0.71 for single mutations, and 0.81 for double mutations. We perform ablation studies to assess which features contribute most to a model's success, and also introduce a voting scheme to synthesize a single prediction from the individual predictions of the three models.

Indexed as

Decision TreesMutationNeural Networks, ComputerSupport Vector MachineAmino Acid SubstitutionComputer SimulationProtein ConformationProteinsProtein StabilityThermodynamicsProteinsDNNmachine learningprotein mutational studyRFrigidity analysisSVR

Identifiers

PMID29382060
PMCPMC6017198
OpenAlexW2794224443

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.