ArticleMedicine2017
Urachal borderline mucinous cystadenoma: A rare case report and literature review.
Article in Medicine, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Mucinous Cystadenoma of the Urachal Remnant Successfully Resected by Laparoscopic Surgery: A Case Report.Cureus · 2024Article
- Rare urachal mucinous cystic tumor of low malignant potential with peritoneal pseudomyxoma: A case report.Experimental and therapeutic medicine · 2023Article
- Urachal mucinous cystic tumor of low malignant potential in a polymorbid female: a case report and review of the literature.International cancer conference journal · 2022Article
- Urachal Mucinous Cystic Tumor of Low Malignant Potential with Concurrent Sigmoid Colon Adenocarcinoma.Case reports in gastrointestinal medicine · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
rationaleUrachal borderline mucinous cystadenoma is very rare and has only 9 cases in the current literature with the biological behavior between adenoma and adenocarcinoma. PATIENT CONCERNS: We reported a 41-year-old man with moderate lower abdominal pain, and the imaging examination found an irregular cystic lesion extending from umbilicus to the dome of urinary bladder with significant separations and calcifications. DIAGNOSES: The diagnosis was confirmed according to the specific anatomical location and pathological examination which was proved as mucinous cystadenoma with low malignant potential.
interventionsThe patient undertook radical excision and partial cystectomy. OUTCOMES: His postoperative condition was good. LESSONS: Urachal borderline mucinous cystadenoma can be located by image examination, which may also offer several diagnostic tips according to separation, calcification, and enhancement in computed tomography scan. When combined with pathological findings, qualitative diagnosis can be determined. Surgical resection should be chosen as an optimal treatment. Our present study reviewed the clinical and biological information of all previous cases which were diagnosed as urachal borderline mucinous cystadenoma and we supplemented more data for further study.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.