ArticleMedicine2017
WATCHMAN device-related thrombus successfully treated with apixaban: A case report.
Article in Medicine, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Efficacy and Safety of New Oral Anticoagulants versus Warfarin in the Resolution of Atrial Fibrillation with Left Atrial/Left Atrial Appendage Thrombus: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Reviews in cardiovascular medicine · 2025Pooled it
- Article
- Who Watches the "Watchman" and How Often?Cureus · 2020Article
- Device-Related Thrombus After Left Atrial Appendage Closure.Interventional cardiology (London, England) · 2019Review
- Acute Device-Related Thrombus after Watchman Device Implant.Case reports in cardiology · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
rationaleAmong atrial fibrillation patients with high risk of bleeding, left atrial appendage occlusion has emerged as an alternative to long-term oral anticoagulation therapy for stroke prevention. Device-related thrombus remains a major concern because it may result in recurrent embolic events. To date, there is no consensus on the optimal method of treating device-related-thrombus. PATIENT CONCERNS: A 78-year-old man with atrial fibrillation had an episode of intracranial hemorrhage while taking warfarin. He subsequently underwent percutaneous placement of a 30-mm Watchman device to the left atrial appendage. He was prescribed dual anti-platelet therapy with aspirin and clopidogrel. DIAGNOSIS: Reassessment echocardiography 3 months later found device-related thrombus.
interventionsThe antithrombotic regimen was switched from dual antiplatelet therapy to apixaban. OUTCOMES: Reassessment echocardiography 3 months later revealed complete resolution of the device-related thrombus. Apixaban was stopped. He had dual antiplatelet therapy for 6 more months followed by life-long aspirin. There was no bleeding complication since implantation of Watchman device. LESSONS: We demonstrated successful treatment of device-related thrombus with a short course of apixaban with complete resolution of thrombus. Further randomized controlled trials are required to determine the choice and duration of drug therapy for device-related thrombus.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.