Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29381793›Full record

Trial reportThe American journal of clinical nutrition2018

Intrauterine DHA exposure and child body composition at 5 y: exploratory analysis of a randomized controlled trial of prenatal DHA supplementation.

Brandon H Hidaka, Jocelynn M Thodosoff, Elizabeth H Kerling, Holly R Hull, John Colombo, Susan E Carlson

Registry-linked trialOpen access · bronzeAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in The American journal of clinical nutrition, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT00266825 (Kansas University DHA Outcome Study), which is not on this map. Cited by 12 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT00266825 phase3completednot on this map

Kansas University DHA Outcome Study (KUDOS)

TypeinterventionalSponsorSusan Carlson, PhDRan2006 to 2011Enrolled350ConditionsPregnancyArmsDHA, Placebo capsule
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Omega-3 fatty acid addition during pregnancy.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2018
    Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Brandon H HidakaDepartment of Dietetics and Nutrition, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, KS.
Jocelynn M ThodosoffDepartment of Dietetics and Nutrition, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, KS.
Elizabeth H KerlingDepartment of Dietetics and Nutrition, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, KS.
Holly R HullDepartment of Dietetics and Nutrition, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, KS.
John ColomboDepartment of Psychology, University of Kansas, Lawrence, KS.
Susan E CarlsonDepartment of Dietetics and Nutrition, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, KS.
University of Kansas Medical Center · USUniversity of Kansas · US

Funding

DHA Supplementation and Pregnancy OutcomeR01HD047315 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF KANSAS MEDICAL CENTER · PI CARLSON, SUSAN E, COLOMBO, JOHN A. · 2006 to 2016
$4.9M
NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD047315
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Observational studies find associations between maternal docosahexaenoic acid (DHA) and greater fat-free mass and lower percentage of body fat, but randomized trials of prenatal DHA supplementation have not found significant intent-to-treat effects on childhood body composition. Objective: This study sought to explore associations between intrauterine DHA exposure and body composition and size at 5 y in the offspring of women who participated in a randomized trial of prenatal DHA supplementation (corn and soybean oil placebo or 600 mg/d). Design: At 5 y, body composition was measured by air displacement plethysmography in 154 offspring of women who had participated in the Kansas University DHA Outcomes Study and who had red blood cell (RBC) phospholipid (PL) fatty acids assessed at enrollment and delivery. We used linear regression models to analyze the relation among 3 indicators of intrauterine DHA exposure-1) intent-to-treat (placebo or DHA), 2) maternal RBC PL DHA status at delivery, and 3) change in maternal DHA (delivery minus enrollment)-and 6 outcomes of interest: 5-y fat mass, fat-free mass, percentage of body fat, height, weight, and body mass index z score. Results: Change in maternal RBC PL DHA correlated with higher fat-free mass (r = 0.21, P = 0.0088); the association was unchanged after adjustment for maternal, perinatal, and childhood dietary factors. Intent-to-treat and DHA status at delivery showed positive trends with fat-free mass that were not statistically significant. There was no evidence relating intrauterine DHA exposure to any other body composition measure. Conclusions: Change in maternal DHA status during pregnancy was related to higher offspring 5-y fat-free mass. The other 2 indicators of intrauterine exposure to DHA suggested a trend for higher offspring 5-y fat-free mass. Our findings agree with an earlier observational study from the United Kingdom. This trial was registered at clinicaltrials.gov as NCT00266825.

Indexed as

Body CompositionMaternal Nutritional Physiological PhenomenaBody Mass IndexBody WeightChild DevelopmentChild, PreschoolDietary SupplementsDocosahexaenoic AcidsDouble-Blind MethodErythrocytesFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansMalePlethysmographyPregnancyDocosahexaenoic Acids

Identifiers

PMID29381793
PMCPMC5972598
OpenAlexW2790970198

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.