Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29381762›Full record

ArticlePloS one2018

A user-friendly tool to evaluate the effectiveness of no-take marine reserves.

Juan Carlos Villaseñor-Derbez, Caio Faro, Melaina Wright, Jael Martínez, Sean Fitzgerald, Stuart Fulton, Maria Del Mar Mancha-Cisneros, Gavin McDonald, Fiorenza Micheli, Alvin Suárez and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Juan Carlos Villaseñor-DerbezBren School of Environmental Science and Management, University of California Santa Barbara, Santa Barbara, California, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0003-1245-589X
Caio FaroBren School of Environmental Science and Management, University of California Santa Barbara, Santa Barbara, California, United States of America.
Melaina WrightBren School of Environmental Science and Management, University of California Santa Barbara, Santa Barbara, California, United States of America.
Jael MartínezBren School of Environmental Science and Management, University of California Santa Barbara, Santa Barbara, California, United States of America.
Sean FitzgeraldBren School of Environmental Science and Management, University of California Santa Barbara, Santa Barbara, California, United States of America.
Stuart FultonComunidad y Biodiversidad A.C., Calle Isla del Peruano, Guaymas, Sonora, México.
Maria Del Mar Mancha-CisnerosSchool of Life Sciences, Arizona State University, Tempe, Arizona, United States of America.
Gavin McDonaldBren School of Environmental Science and Management, University of California Santa Barbara, Santa Barbara, California, United States of America.
Fiorenza MicheliHopkins Marine Station and Center for Ocean Solutions, Stanford University, Pacific Grove, CA, 93950, United States of America.
Alvin SuárezComunidad y Biodiversidad A.C., Calle Isla del Peruano, Guaymas, Sonora, México.
Jorge TorreComunidad y Biodiversidad A.C., Calle Isla del Peruano, Guaymas, Sonora, México.
Christopher CostelloBren School of Environmental Science and Management, University of California Santa Barbara, Santa Barbara, California, United States of America.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Marine reserves are implemented to achieve a variety of objectives, but are seldom rigorously evaluated to determine whether those objectives are met. In the rare cases when evaluations do take place, they typically focus on ecological indicators and ignore other relevant objectives such as socioeconomics and governance. And regardless of the objectives, the diversity of locations, monitoring protocols, and analysis approaches hinder the ability to compare results across case studies. Moreover, analysis and evaluation of reserves is generally conducted by outside researchers, not the reserve managers or users, plausibly thereby hindering effective local management and rapid response to change. We present a framework and tool, called "MAREA", to overcome these challenges. Its purpose is to evaluate the extent to which any given reserve has achieved its stated objectives. MAREA provides specific guidance on data collection and formatting, and then conducts rigorous causal inference analysis based on data input by the user, providing real-time outputs about the effectiveness of the reserve. MAREA's ease of use, standardization of state-of-the-art inference methods, and ability to analyze marine reserve effectiveness across ecological, socioeconomic, and governance objectives could dramatically further our understanding and support of effective marine reserve management.

Indexed as

SeawaterAnimalsBiodiversityConservation of Natural ResourcesEvaluation Studies as TopicMarine Biology

Identifiers

PMID29381762
PMCPMC5790253

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.