Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29381748›Full record

ArticlePloS one2018

Common neural structures activated by epidural and transcutaneous lumbar spinal cord stimulation: Elicitation of posterior root-muscle reflexes.

Ursula S Hofstoetter, Brigitta Freundl, Heinrich Binder, Karen Minassian

2 registry-linked trialsAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 138 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
138citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03924388 naunknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2020, after this paper: background citation

The Effects of Spinal Cord Stimulation on Autonomic Function in People With Spinal Cord Injury

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of CalgaryRan2020 to 2022Enrolled46ConditionsSpinal Cord Injuries, Autonomic Dysreflexia, Orthostatic Hypotension, DysautonomicArmsEpidural spinal cord stimulation, Trnascutaneous electrical spinal cord stimulation.
NCT06587841 narecruitingnot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

Noninvasive Spinal Cord Neuromodulation to Improve Lower Urinary Tract Function After Spinal Cord Injury in Ukrainian War Veterans

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of British ColumbiaRan2024 to 2027Enrolled60ConditionsSpinal Cord Injuries, Bowel Dysfunction, Sexual Dysfunction, Autonomic DysfunctionArmsSpinal COrd NEuromodulation™ (SCONE™) for transcutaneous spinal cord stimulation (TSCS)
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

138 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

78 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Ursula S HofstoetterCenter for Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering, Medical University Vienna, Vienna, Austria.ORCID 0000-0002-3156-6483
Brigitta FreundlNeurological Center, Maria Theresien Schloessel, Otto Wagner Hospital, Vienna, Austria.
Heinrich BinderNeurological Center, Maria Theresien Schloessel, Otto Wagner Hospital, Vienna, Austria.
Karen MinassianCenter for Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering, Medical University Vienna, Vienna, Austria.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Epidural electrical stimulation of the lumbar spinal cord is currently regaining momentum as a neuromodulation intervention in spinal cord injury (SCI) to modify dysregulated sensorimotor functions and augment residual motor capacity. There is ample evidence that it engages spinal circuits through the electrical stimulation of large-to-medium diameter afferent fibers within lumbar and upper sacral posterior roots. Recent pilot studies suggested that the surface electrode-based method of transcutaneous spinal cord stimulation (SCS) may produce similar neuromodulatory effects as caused by epidural SCS. Neurophysiological and computer modeling studies proposed that this noninvasive technique stimulates posterior-root fibers as well, likely activating similar input structures to the spinal cord as epidural stimulation. Here, we add a yet missing piece of evidence substantiating this assumption. We conducted in-depth analyses and direct comparisons of the electromyographic (EMG) characteristics of short-latency responses in multiple leg muscles to both stimulation techniques derived from ten individuals with SCI each. Post-activation depression of responses evoked by paired pulses applied either epidurally or transcutaneously confirmed the reflex nature of the responses. The muscle responses to both techniques had the same latencies, EMG peak-to-peak amplitudes, and waveforms, except for smaller responses with shorter onset latencies in the triceps surae muscle group and shorter offsets of the responses in the biceps femoris muscle during epidural stimulation. Responses obtained in three subjects tested with both methods at different time points had near-identical waveforms per muscle group as well as same onset latencies. The present results strongly corroborate the activation of common neural input structures to the lumbar spinal cord-predominantly primary afferent fibers within multiple posterior roots-by both techniques and add to unraveling the basic mechanisms underlying electrical SCS.

Indexed as

ReflexAdolescentAdultAgedFemaleHumansLumbar VertebraeMaleMiddle AgedSpinal CordYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID29381748
PMCPMC5790266

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.