Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29381740›Full record

ArticlePloS one2018

Variation in grain Zn concentration, and the grain ionome, in field-grown Indian wheat.

Jaswant Singh Khokhar, Sindhu Sareen, Bhudeva Singh Tyagi, Gyanendra Singh, Lolita Wilson, Ian P King, Scott D Young, Martin R Broadley

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. The 4T and 7T introgressions fromFrontiers in plant science · 2024
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. GlutacetinePlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Jaswant Singh KhokharSchool of Biosciences, University of Nottingham, Sutton Bonington Campus, Loughborough, United Kingdom.
Sindhu SareenIndian Institute of Wheat & Barley Research, Karnal, (Haryana), India.
Bhudeva Singh TyagiIndian Institute of Wheat & Barley Research, Karnal, (Haryana), India.
Gyanendra SinghIndian Institute of Wheat & Barley Research, Karnal, (Haryana), India.
Lolita WilsonSchool of Biosciences, University of Nottingham, Sutton Bonington Campus, Loughborough, United Kingdom.
Ian P KingSchool of Biosciences, University of Nottingham, Sutton Bonington Campus, Loughborough, United Kingdom.
Scott D YoungSchool of Biosciences, University of Nottingham, Sutton Bonington Campus, Loughborough, United Kingdom.
Martin R BroadleySchool of Biosciences, University of Nottingham, Sutton Bonington Campus, Loughborough, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0003-3964-7226

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Wheat is an important dietary source of zinc (Zn) and other mineral elements in many countries. Dietary Zn deficiency is widespread, especially in developing countries, and breeding (genetic biofortification) through the HarvestPlus programme has recently started to deliver new wheat varieties to help alleviate this problem in South Asia. To better understand the potential of wheat to alleviate dietary Zn deficiency, this study aimed to characterise the baseline effects of genotype (G), site (E), and genotype by site interactions (GxE) on grain Zn concentration under a wide range of soil conditions in India. Field experiments were conducted on a diverse panel of 36 Indian-adapted wheat genotypes, grown on a range of soil types (pH range 4.5-9.5), in 2013-14 (five sites) and 2014-15 (six sites). Grain samples were analysed using inductively coupled plasma-mass spectrometry (ICP-MS). The mean grain Zn concentration of the genotypes ranged from 24.9-34.8 mg kg-1, averaged across site and year. Genotype and site effects were associated with 10% and 6% of the overall variation in grain Zn concentration, respectively. Whilst G x E interaction effects were evident across the panel, some genotypes had consistent rankings between sites and years. Grain Zn concentration correlated positively with grain concentrations of iron (Fe), sulphur (S), and eight other elements, but did not correlate negatively with grain yield, i.e. no yield dilution was observed. Despite a relatively small contribution of genotype to the overall variation in grain Zn concentration, due to experiments being conducted across many contrasting sites and two years, our data are consistent with reports that biofortifying wheat through breeding is likely to be effective at scale given that some genotypes performed consistently across diverse soil types. Notably, all soils in this study were probably Zn deficient and interactions between wheat genotypes and soil Zn availability/management (e.g. the use of Zn-containing fertilisers) need to be better-understood to improve Zn supply in food systems.

Indexed as

IndiaTriticumZincZinc

Identifiers

PMID29381740
PMCPMC5790267

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.