Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29381527›Full record

ReviewHarvard review of psychiatry

Community, Public Policy, and Recovery from Mental Illness: Emerging Research and Initiatives.

Enrico G Castillo, Bowen Chung, Elizabeth Bromley, Sheryl H Kataoka, Joel T Braslow, Susan M Essock, Alexander S Young, Jared M Greenberg, Jeanne Miranda, Lisa B Dixon and 1 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Harvard review of psychiatry. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Enrico G CastilloFrom the Center for Health Services and Society (Drs. Chung, Bromley, Kataoka, Young, Miranda, and Wells), Center for Social Medicine and Humanities (Drs. Braslow and Castillo), Division of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry (Dr. Kataoka), Department of Psychiatry and Biobehavioral Sciences (Dr. Greenberg), David Geffen School of Medicine, and School of Public Health (Drs. Miranda and Wells), University of California, Los Angeles; Los Angeles County Department of Mental Health (Dr. Castillo); RAND Corporation (Drs. Chung and Wells); Los Angeles Biomedical Research Institute (Dr. Chung); Healthy African American Families II (Dr. Chung); Health Services Research & Development Center of Innovation (Dr. Young), Desert Pacific MIRECC Health Services Unit (Drs. Bromley and Greenberg), VA Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System; Division of Behavioral Health Services and Policy Research, Department of Psychiatry, Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons (Drs. Essock and Dixon); New York State Psychiatric Institute (Drs. Essock and Dixon).
Bowen Chung
Elizabeth Bromley
Sheryl H Kataoka
Joel T Braslow
Susan M Essock
Alexander S Young
Jared M Greenberg
Jeanne Miranda
Lisa B Dixon
Kenneth B Wells

Funding

UCLA Clinical Translational Science InstituteUL1TR001881 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI ARLEEN F. BROWN, ARASH NAEIM · 2016 to 2026
$118.1M
COMMUNITY PARTNERS IN CARER01MH078853 · NIMH · RAND CORPORATION · PI WELLS, KENNETH B. · 2007 to 2011
$6.0M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001881NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH078853
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This commentary examines the roles that communities and public policies play in the definition and processes of recovery for adults with mental illness. Policy, clinical, and consumer definitions of recovery are reviewed, which highlight the importance of communities and policies for recovery. This commentary then presents a framework for the relationships between community-level factors, policies, and downstream mental health outcomes, focusing on macroeconomic, housing, and health care policies; adverse exposures such as crime victimization; and neighborhood characteristics such as social capital. Initiatives that address community contexts to improve mental health outcomes are currently under way. Common characteristics of such initiatives and select examples are discussed. This commentary concludes with a discussion of providers', consumers', and other stakeholders' roles in shaping policy reform and community change to facilitate recovery.

Indexed as

Ill-Housed PersonsPublic PolicyResidence CharacteristicsSocial CapitalSocial ClassSocial EnvironmentHumansMental Disorders

Identifiers

PMID29381527
PMCPMC5843494

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.