Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29381492›Full record

ArticleEpidemiology (Cambridge, Mass.)2018

Lung Function in Oil Spill Response Workers 1-3 Years After the Deepwater Horizon Disaster.

Kaitlyn B Gam, Richard K Kwok, Lawrence S Engel, Matthew D Curry, Patricia A Stewart, Mark R Stenzel, John A McGrath, W Braxton Jackson, Robert L Jensen, Alexander P Keil and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Epidemiology (Cambridge, Mass.), 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Toxicological Effects of Inhaled Crude Oil Vapor.Current environmental health reports · 2024
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. A review of the toxicology of oil in vertebrates: what we have learned following theJournal of toxicology and environmental health. Part B, Critical reviews · 2021
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Lung function in oil spill responders 4-6 years after the Deepwater Horizon disaster.Journal of toxicology and environmental health. Part A · 2020
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Kaitlyn B Gam
Richard K Kwok
Lawrence S Engel
Matthew D Curry
Patricia A Stewart
Mark R Stenzel
John A McGrath
W Braxton Jackson
Robert L Jensen
Alexander P Keil
Maureen Y Lichtveld
Aubrey K Miller
Dale P Sandler

Funding

Gulf Longitudinal Follow-up (GuLF) Worker StudyZIAES102945 · NIEHS · NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH SCIENCES · PI SANDLER, DALE P · 2010 to 2025
$15.3M
Intramural NIH HHS ZIA ES102945
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundLittle is known about the effects of inhalation exposures on lung function among workers involved in the mitigation of oil spills. Our objective was to determine the relationship between oil spill response work and lung function 1-3 years after the Deepwater Horizon (DWH) disaster.

methodsWe evaluated spirometry for 7,775 adults living in the Gulf states who either participated in DWH response efforts (workers) or received safety training but were not hired (nonworkers). At an enrollment interview, we collected detailed work histories including information on potential exposure to dispersants and burning oil/gas. We assessed forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1; mL), forced vital capacity (FVC; mL), and the ratio (FEV1/FVC%) for differences by broad job classes and exposure to dispersants or burning oil/gas using multivariable linear and modified Poisson regression.

resultsWe found no differences between workers and nonworkers. Among workers, we observed a small decrement in FEV1 (Beta, -71 mL; 95% confidence interval [CI], -127 to -14) in decontamination workers compared with support workers. Workers with high potential exposure to burning oil/gas had reduced lung function compared with unexposed workers: FEV1 (Beta, -183 mL; 95% CI, -316 to -49) and FEV1/FVC (Beta, -1.93%; 95% CI, -3.50 to -0.36), and an elevated risk of having a FEV1/FVC in the lowest tertile (prevalence ratio, 1.38; 95% CI, 0.99 to 1.92).

conclusionsWhile no differences in lung function were found between workers and nonworkers, lung function was reduced among decontamination workers and workers with high exposure to burning oil/gas compared with unexposed workers.

Indexed as

DisastersOil and Gas IndustryPetroleum PollutionAdultFemaleHumansInhalation ExposureLung InjuryMaleMiddle AgedProspective StudiesSoutheastern United StatesSpirometry

Identifiers

PMID29381492
PMCPMC5882518

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.