Canadian Urological Association guideline on the care of the normal foreskin and neonatal circumcision in Canadian infants (abridged version).

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

1. Foreskin care: Hygiene, importance of counselling, and management of common complications.Canadian family physician Medecin de famille canadien · 2025
   Review
2. Shared decision-making for pediatric elective penile surgery.Canadian Urological Association journal = Journal de l'Association des urologues du Canada · 2022
   Article
3. Circumcision in childhood and male sexual function: a blessing or a curse?International journal of impotence research · 2021
   Review
4. Neonatal male circumcision is associated with altered adult socio-affective processing.Heliyon · 2020
   Article
5. An epidemiologic overview of a tertiary referral practice for male paediatric lichen sclerosus.Paediatrics & child health · 2020
   Article

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.