ReviewHuman vaccines & immunotherapeutics2018
Regulatory T cells (Tregs): A major immune checkpoint to consider in combinatorial therapeutic HIV-1 vaccines.
Review in Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Article
- Effect of regulatory T cells on the efficacy of the fatty acid-binding protein vaccine against Schistosoma japonicum.Parasitology research · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The field of immunotherapeutics is living an exceptional time as new antibodies that take brakes off T-cells and unleash them on tumours are being approved by the US-Food and Drug Administration (FDA). For the design and development of an HIV-1 therapeutic-vaccine, one would need preferably to shift the balance T-effectors/T-regulatory cells (Teff/Tregs) towards effectors to improve vaccine-specific immune-responses. Given the success with the new immune-checkpoint-blockers (ICB), it is an appropriate time for HIV-1 field to seize this opportunity and develop new therapeutic vaccine-strategies that take into consideration ICB and other immunomodulators such as cytokines. While the vaccine is important to stimulate HIV-1-specific T-cell responses, cytokines will support the expansion of the stimulated virus-specific T-cells and ICB will reverse exhaustion and unchain cytotoxic T-cells. In this commentary, we will spotlight Tregs as another major brake for T-cell immunity and address the main stumbling-blocks that often blurs HIV-1-specific-Tregs status with regards to their role (beneficial or detrimental) and we will recall some proof-of-concept studies where therapeutic immunization skewed the HIV-1-specific response from Tregs to Teffs which impacts on the magnitude of viral replication. We will also suggest some strategies to shift the balance towards Teffs and potentiate HIV-1-specific immune-responses.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.