Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29380823›Full record

SynthesisThe American journal of gastroenterology2018

Efficacy and Tolerability of Guanylate Cyclase-C Agonists for Irritable Bowel Syndrome with Constipation and Chronic Idiopathic Constipation: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Eric D Shah, Hyungjin Myra Kim, Philip Schoenfeld

Open access · greenAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in The American journal of gastroenterology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 50 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
50citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
11.7field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

50 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 117 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. [Seoul Consensus on Clinical Practice Guidelines for Functional Constipation].The Korean journal of gastroenterology = Taehan Sohwagi Hakhoe chi · 2025
    Guideline
  4. Guideline
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. [Pharmacologic Treatment of Irritable Bowel Syndrome with Predominant Constipation].The Korean journal of gastroenterology = Taehan Sohwagi Hakhoe chi · 2025
    Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Constipation in Patients With Chronic Kidney Disease.Journal of neurogastroenterology and motility · 2023
    Review
  14. The Burden and Treatment of Chronic Constipation Among US Nursing Home Residents.Journal of the American Medical Directors Association · 2023
    Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Eric D ShahDivision of Gastroenterology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
Hyungjin Myra KimCenter for Statistical Consultation and Research, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
Philip SchoenfeldDivision of Gastroenterology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
University of Michigan–Ann Arbor · US

Funding

Training Program in Gastrointestinal EpidemiologyT32DK062708 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI Peter D.R. Higgins, Elliot Tapper · 2003 to 2026
$3.9M
Patient Oriented Research in Gastrointestinal Cancer ScreeningK24DK084208 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI SCHOENFELD, PHILIP S · 2010 to 2014
$670k
NIDDK NIH HHS K24 DK084208NIDDK NIH HHS T32 DK062708
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesLinaclotide and plecanatide are guanylate cyclase-C (GCC) agonists for the treatment of chronic idiopathic constipation (CIC) and irritable bowel syndrome with constipation (IBS-C). Our objective is to evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of GCC agonists based on data from multiple randomized controlled trials (RCTs).

methodsWe searched PubMED, EMBASE, Cochrane databases, clinicaltrials.gov, major conference abstracts, Food and Drug Administration (FDA) websites, and United States Securities and Exchange Commission filings of drug sponsors to identify RCTs of CIC or IBS-C patients. We assessed efficacy based on FDA-approved composite responder endpoints, diarrhea as an adverse event, and study withdrawal owing to diarrhea for each therapy. Trial results were pooled using DerSimonian and Laird random effects model of meta-analysis and exact logistic regression when appropriate with 95% confidence intervals. Meta-regression was performed to compare outcomes between therapies adjusting for placebo event rate.

resultsEight linaclotide trials (five CIC; three IBS-C) and seven plecanatide trials (four CIC; three IBS-C) evaluating 10,369 patients met inclusion criteria. FDA publications documented that different definitions for diarrhea were used in linaclotide vs. plecanatide trials. Both drugs were efficacious in treating CIC (linaclotide 72 μg (Odds ratio (OR)=3.11, 95% CI 1.81-5.34); linaclotide 145 μg (OR=3.25, 2.15-4.91); plecanatide 3 mg (OR=1.99, 1.57-2.51)) and IBS-C (linaclotide 290 μg (OR=2.43, 1.48-3.98); plecanatide 3 mg (OR=1.87, 1.47-2.38); plecanatide 6 mg (OR=1.92, 1.48-2.48)). Diarrhea occurred in excess of placebo in treating CIC (linaclotide 72 μg (OR=3.07, 1.97-4.77); linaclotide 145 μg (OR=3.70, 2.69-5.10); plecanatide 3 mg (OR=3.86, 1.83-8.12)) and IBS-C (linaclotide 290 μg (OR=8.02, 5.20-12.37); plecanatide 3 mg (OR=5.55, 1.62-19.00); plecanatide 6 mg (OR=4.13, 1.57-10.83)). Based on meta-regression, there were no statistically significant differences between therapies in odds ratios for efficacy, diarrhea, or diarrhea-related study withdrawals.

conclusionsBoth linaclotide and plecanatide demonstrate similar efficacy and tolerability in treating IBS-C and CIC. No differences in odds of diarrhea were seen between linaclotide and plecanatide.

Indexed as

Chronic DiseaseConstipationDiarrheaGuanylyl Cyclase C AgonistsHumansIrritable Bowel SyndromeNatriuretic PeptidesPeptidesRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicGuanylyl Cyclase C AgonistslinaclotideNatriuretic PeptidesPeptidesplecanatide

Identifiers

PMID29380823
PMCPMC7213047
OpenAlexW2789261715

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.