Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29380409›Full record

ArticleStatistics in medicine2018

Morning surge in blood pressure using a random-effects multiple-component cosinor model.

J M Madden, L D Browne, X Li, P M Kearney, A P Fitzgerald

Open access · hybridAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Statistics in medicine, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 37% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. A novel model describing blood pressure profiles.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. [A study to identify obstructive sleep apnea syndrome based on 24 h ambulatory blood pressure data].Sheng wu yi xue gong cheng xue za zhi = Journal of biomedical engineering = Shengwu yixue gongchengxue zazhi · 2022
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

J M MaddenRCSI Population and Health Sciences, Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland, Dublin, Ireland.ORCID 0000-0003-2383-5150
L D BrowneDepartment of Epidemiology & Public Health, University College Cork, Cork, Ireland.ORCID 0000-0003-1361-1436
X LiDepartment of Mathematics and Statistics, La Trobe University, Melbourne, Australia.
P M KearneyDepartment of Epidemiology & Public Health, University College Cork, Cork, Ireland.
A P FitzgeraldDepartment of Epidemiology & Public Health, University College Cork, Cork, Ireland.
University College Cork · IELa Trobe University · AURoyal College of Surgeons in Ireland · IE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Blood pressure (BP) fluctuates throughout the day. The pattern it follows represents one of the most important circadian rhythms in the human body. For example, morning BP surge has been suggested as a potential risk factor for cardiovascular events occurring in the morning, but the accurate quantification of this phenomenon remains a challenge. Here, we outline a novel method to quantify morning surge. We demonstrate how the most commonly used method to model 24-hour BP, the single cosinor approach, can be extended to a multiple-component cosinor random-effects model. We outline how this model can be used to obtain a measure of morning BP surge by obtaining derivatives of the model fit. The model is compared with a functional principal component analysis that determines the main components of variability in the data. Data from the Mitchelstown Study, a population-based study of Irish adults (n = 2047), were used where a subsample (1207) underwent 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure monitoring. We demonstrate that our 2-component model provided a significant improvement in fit compared with a single model and a similar fit to a more complex model captured by b-splines using functional principal component analysis. The estimate of the average maximum slope was 2.857 mmHg/30 min (bootstrap estimates; 95% CI: 2.855-2.858 mmHg/30 min). Simulation results allowed us to quantify the between-individual SD in maximum slopes, which was 1.02 mmHg/30 min. By obtaining derivatives we have demonstrated a novel approach to quantify morning BP surge and its variation between individuals. This is the first demonstration of cosinor approach to obtain a measure of morning surge.

Indexed as

Principal Component AnalysisBlood PressureCircadian RhythmComputer SimulationFemaleHumansIrelandMaleMiddle AgedRisk FactorsTimeblood pressure patternscircadian modellingmixed-effects models

Identifiers

PMID29380409
PMCPMC5947147
OpenAlexW2793283920

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.