ReviewJournal of autism and developmental disorders2018
A Comparative Analysis of the ADOS-G and ADOS-2 Algorithms: Preliminary Findings.
Review in Journal of autism and developmental disorders, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Module-specific diagnostic accuracy of ADOS-2 in real-world clinical referral populations: an updated systematic review and HSROC meta-analysis.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2026Pooled it
- Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of the Clinical Utility of the ADOS-2 and the ADI-R in Diagnosing Autism Spectrum Disorders in Children.Journal of autism and developmental disorders · 2021Pooled it
- Behavioral Assessment Reliability in Clinical Phenotyping and Biomarker Research for Autism.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2026Article
- Artificial Intelligence in Autism Spectrum Disorder Diagnosis: A Scoping Review of Face, Voice, and Text Analysis Methods.Health science reports · 2025Review
- Different functional connectivity optimal frequency in autism compared with healthy controls and the relationship with social communication deficits: Evidence from gene expression and behavior symptom analyses.Human brain mapping · 2023Article
- Replication study for ADOS-2 cut-offs to assist evaluation of autism spectrum disorder.Autism research : official journal of the International Society for Autism Research · 2022Article
- Diagnostic validity of Autism Diagnostic Observation Schedule, second edition (K-ADOS-2) in the Korean population.Molecular autism · 2022Article
- Linked Social-Communication Dimensions and Connectivity in Functional Brain Networks in Autism Spectrum Disorder.Cerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991) · 2021Article
- The Role of Demographics in the Age of Autism Diagnosis in Jerusalem.Journal of autism and developmental disorders · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The Autism Diagnostic Observation Schedule (ADOS) is a widely utilized observational assessment tool for diagnosis of autism spectrum disorders. The original ADOS was succeeded by the ADOS-G with noted improvements. More recently, the ADOS-2 was introduced to further increase its diagnostic accuracy. Studies examining the validity of the ADOS have produced mixed findings, and pooled relationship trends between the algorithm versions are yet to be analyzed. The current review seeks to compare the relative merits of the ADOS-G and ADOS-2 algorithms, Modules 1-3. Eight studies met inclusion criteria for the review, and six were selected for paired comparisons of the sensitivity and specificity of the ADOS. Results indicate several contradictory findings, underscoring the importance of further study.
Indexed as
Identifiers
29380271What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.