ArticleInternational journal of legal medicine2018
Investigating the sex-related geometric variation of the human cranium.
Article in International journal of legal medicine, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- Sex estimation through the lens of cross-sectional geometric properties of the ulna.Forensic sciences research · 2025Article
- Sex determination based on features of the craniofacial bones in a sample of the central Chinese population using cone beam computed tomography.Forensic sciences research · 2025Article
- Mandibular and dental measurements for sex determination using machine learning.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Cranial and Odontological Methods for Sex Estimation-A Scoping Review.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2022Article
- Article
- Advancements in sex estimation using the diaphyseal cross-sectional geometric properties of the lower and upper limbs.International journal of legal medicine · 2021Article
- Forensic sex estimation using the vertebrae: an evaluation on two European populations.International journal of legal medicine · 2020Article
- Advanced procedures for skull sex estimation using sexually dimorphic morphometric features.International journal of legal medicine · 2020Article
- Deep phenotyping in zebrafish reveals genetic and diet-induced adiposity changes that may inform disease risk.Journal of lipid research · 2018Article
- Forensic evaluation of craniometric characteristics of the Kazakhstan population.Journal of oral biology and craniofacial researchArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Accurate sexing methods are of great importance in forensic anthropology since sex assessment is among the principal tasks when examining human skeletal remains. The present study explores a novel approach in assessing the most accurate metric traits of the human cranium for sex estimation based on 80 ectocranial landmarks from 176 modern individuals of known age and sex from the Athens Collection. The purpose of the study is to identify those distance and angle measurements that can be most effectively used in sex assessment. Three-dimensional landmark coordinates were digitized with a Microscribe 3DX and analyzed in GNU Octave. An iterative linear discriminant analysis of all possible combinations of landmarks was performed for each unique set of the 3160 distances and 246,480 angles. Cross-validated correct classification as well as multivariate DFA on top performing variables reported 13 craniometric distances with over 85% classification accuracy, 7 angles over 78%, as well as certain multivariate combinations yielding over 95%. Linear regression of these variables with the centroid size was used to assess their relation to the size of the cranium. In contrast to the use of generalized procrustes analysis (GPA) and principal component analysis (PCA), which constitute the common analytical work flow for such data, our method, although computational intensive, produced easily applicable discriminant functions of high accuracy, while at the same time explored the maximum of cranial variability.
Indexed as
Identifiers
29380124What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.