Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29380087›Full record

ArticleThe European physical journal. E, Soft matter2018

Issues in data expansion in understanding criticality in biological systems.

Vaibhav Wasnik

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in The European physical journal. E, Soft matter, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Vaibhav WasnikDepartment of Biochemistry, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland. Vaibhav.Wasnik@unige.ch.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

At the point of a second-order phase transition also termed as a critical point, systems display long-range order and their macroscopic behaviors are independent of the microscopic details making up the system. Due to these properties, it has long been speculated that biological systems that show similar behavior despite having very different microscopics, may be operating near a critical point. Recent methods in neuroscience are making it possible to explore whether criticality exists in neural networks. Despite being large in size, many datasets are only a minute sample of the neural system and methods have to be developed to expand these datasets to study criticality. In this work we develop an analytical method of expanding a dataset to the large N limit to make statements about the critical nature of the dataset. We show that different ways of expanding the dataset while keeping its variance and mean fixed yield different results regarding criticality. This hence casts doubts on the established procedures for deducing criticality of biological systems through expansion of finite-sized datasets.

Indexed as

Models, BiologicalPhase TransitionComputer SimulationDatasets as TopicMetabolic Networks and PathwaysLiving systems: Biological networks

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.