Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29380027›Full record

ArticleMicrobial ecology2018

Honey Bee (Apis mellifera) Pollen Foraging Reflects Benefits Dependent on Individual Infection Status.

Jade A Ferguson, Tobin D Northfield, Lori Lach

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Microbial ecology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Age and Season Effect the Timing of Adult Worker Honeybee Infection byFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2021
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Pathogen spillover from Apis mellifera to a stingless bee.Proceedings. Biological sciences · 2019
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Jade A FergusonCentre for Tropical Environmental and Sustainability Science, College of Science and Engineering, James Cook University, PO Box 6811, Cairns, Queensland, 4870, Australia.
Tobin D NorthfieldCentre for Tropical Environmental and Sustainability Science, College of Science and Engineering, James Cook University, PO Box 6811, Cairns, Queensland, 4870, Australia.
Lori LachCentre for Tropical Environmental and Sustainability Science, College of Science and Engineering, James Cook University, PO Box 6811, Cairns, Queensland, 4870, Australia. lori.lach@jcu.edu.au.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5137-5185
James Cook University · AUAustralian Institute of Tropical Health and Medicine · AU

Funding

Australian Research Council DE130100709
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Parasites often modify host foraging behavior, for example, by spurring changes to nutrient intake ratios or triggering self-medication. The gut parasite, Nosema ceranae, increases energy needs of the European or Western honey bee (Apis mellifera), but little is known about how infection affects foraging behavior. We used a combination of experiments and observations of caged and free-flying individual bees and hives to determine how N. ceranae affects honey bee foraging behavior. In an experiment with caged bees, we found that infected bees with access to a high-quality pollen were more likely to survive than infected bees with access to a lower quality pollen or no pollen. Non-infected bees showed no difference in survival with pollen quality. We then tested free-flying bees in an arena of artificial flowers and found that pollen foraging bees chose pollen commensurate with their infection status; twice as many infected bees selected the higher quality pollen than the lower quality pollen, while healthy bees showed no preference between pollen types. However, healthy and infected bees visited sucrose and pollen flowers in the same proportions. Among hive-level observations, we found no significant correlations between N. ceranae infection intensity in the hive and the proportion of bees returning with pollen. Our results indicate that N. ceranae-infected bees benefit from increased pollen quality and will selectively forage for higher quality while foraging for pollen, but infection status does not lead to increased pollen foraging at either the individual or hive levels.

Indexed as

PollenAnimal FeedAnimalsBeesBehavior, AnimalHost Microbial InteractionsNosemaSurvival RateApis melliferaForaging behaviorHiveNosema ceranaeParasitesPollen preference

Identifiers

PMID29380027
OpenAlexW2791193132

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.