ReviewCancer immunology, immunotherapy : CII2018
Clinical translation and regulatory aspects of CAR/TCR-based adoptive cell therapies-the German Cancer Consortium approach.
Review in Cancer immunology, immunotherapy : CII, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.
- Why advanced therapy medicinal products struggle in clinical translation: an in-depth analysis of developmental challenges in the EU.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Review
- 3D Printing as a Strategy to Scale-Up Biohybrid Hydrogels for T Cell Manufacture.ACS applied materials & interfaces · 2024Article
- Trial watch: chemotherapy-induced immunogenic cell death in oncology.Oncoimmunology · 2023Review
- Modelling urea cycle disorders using iPSCs.NPJ Regenerative medicine · 2022Review
- [Genetically modified regulatory T cells: therapeutic concepts and regulatory aspects].Bundesgesundheitsblatt, Gesundheitsforschung, Gesundheitsschutz · 2020Review
- Trial watch: chemotherapy-induced immunogenic cell death in immuno-oncology.Oncoimmunology · 2020Review
- Research and therapy with induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs): social, legal, and ethical considerations.Stem cell research & therapy · 2019Review
- Gene editing enables T-cell engineering to redirect antigen specificity for potent tumor rejection.Life science alliance · 2019Article
- A long way to the battlefront: CAR T cell therapy against solid cancers.Journal of Cancer · 2019Review
- Considering Cell Therapy Product "Good Manufacturing Practice" Status.Frontiers in medicine · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Adoptive transfer of T cells genetically modified by TCRs or CARs represents a highly attractive novel therapeutic strategy to treat malignant diseases. Various approaches for the development of such gene therapy medicinal products (GTMPs) have been initiated by scientists in recent years. To date, however, the number of clinical trials commenced in Germany and Europe is still low. Several hurdles may contribute to the delay in clinical translation of these therapeutic innovations including the significant complexity of manufacture and non-clinical testing of these novel medicinal products, the limited knowledge about the intricate regulatory requirements of the academic developers as well as limitations of funds for clinical testing. A suitable good manufacturing practice (GMP) environment is a key prerequisite and platform for the development, validation, and manufacture of such cell-based therapies, but may also represent a bottleneck for clinical translation. The German Cancer Consortium (DKTK) and the Paul-Ehrlich-Institut (PEI) have initiated joint efforts of researchers and regulators to facilitate and advance early phase, academia-driven clinical trials. Starting with a workshop held in 2016, stakeholders from academia and regulatory authorities in Germany have entered into continuing discussions on a diversity of scientific, manufacturing, and regulatory aspects, as well as the benefits and risks of clinical application of CAR/TCR-based cell therapies. This review summarizes the current state of discussions of this cooperative approach providing a basis for further policy-making and suitable modification of processes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.