Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29380009›Full record

ReviewCancer immunology, immunotherapy : CII2018

Clinical translation and regulatory aspects of CAR/TCR-based adoptive cell therapies-the German Cancer Consortium approach.

Angela M Krackhardt, Brigitte Anliker, Martin Hildebrandt, Michael Bachmann, Stefan B Eichmüller, Dirk M Nettelbeck, Matthias Renner, Lutz Uharek, Gerald Willimsky, Michael Schmitt and 2 more

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cancer immunology, immunotherapy : CII, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Modelling urea cycle disorders using iPSCs.NPJ Regenerative medicine · 2022
    Review
  5. [Genetically modified regulatory T cells: therapeutic concepts and regulatory aspects].Bundesgesundheitsblatt, Gesundheitsforschung, Gesundheitsschutz · 2020
    Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Angela M KrackhardtKlinik und Poliklinik für Innere Medizin III, Hämatologie und Onkologie, Klinikum rechts der Isar, TU München, TUM School of Medicine, Munich, Germany. angela.krackhardt@tum.de.
Brigitte AnlikerPaul-Ehrlich-Institut (PEI, German Federal Institute for Vaccines and Biomedicines), Langen, Germany.
Martin HildebrandtDKTK-Deutsches Konsortium für Translationale Krebsforschung (German Cancer Consortium) and DKFZ-Deutsches Krebsforschungszentrum (German Cancer Research Center), Heidelberg, Germany.
Michael BachmannDKTK-Deutsches Konsortium für Translationale Krebsforschung (German Cancer Consortium) and DKFZ-Deutsches Krebsforschungszentrum (German Cancer Research Center), Heidelberg, Germany.
Stefan B EichmüllerDKTK-Deutsches Konsortium für Translationale Krebsforschung (German Cancer Consortium) and DKFZ-Deutsches Krebsforschungszentrum (German Cancer Research Center), Heidelberg, Germany.
Dirk M NettelbeckDKTK-Deutsches Konsortium für Translationale Krebsforschung (German Cancer Consortium) and DKFZ-Deutsches Krebsforschungszentrum (German Cancer Research Center), Heidelberg, Germany.
Matthias RennerPaul-Ehrlich-Institut (PEI, German Federal Institute for Vaccines and Biomedicines), Langen, Germany.
Lutz UharekDKTK-Deutsches Konsortium für Translationale Krebsforschung (German Cancer Consortium) and DKFZ-Deutsches Krebsforschungszentrum (German Cancer Research Center), Heidelberg, Germany.
Gerald WillimskyDKTK-Deutsches Konsortium für Translationale Krebsforschung (German Cancer Consortium) and DKFZ-Deutsches Krebsforschungszentrum (German Cancer Research Center), Heidelberg, Germany.
Michael SchmittDKTK-Deutsches Konsortium für Translationale Krebsforschung (German Cancer Consortium) and DKFZ-Deutsches Krebsforschungszentrum (German Cancer Research Center), Heidelberg, Germany.
Winfried S WelsDKTK-Deutsches Konsortium für Translationale Krebsforschung (German Cancer Consortium) and DKFZ-Deutsches Krebsforschungszentrum (German Cancer Research Center), Heidelberg, Germany.
Martina Schüssler-LenzPaul-Ehrlich-Institut (PEI, German Federal Institute for Vaccines and Biomedicines), Langen, Germany.
German Marine Research Consortium · DEPaul Ehrlich Institut · DEHeidelberg University · DEHumboldt-Universität zu Berlin · DEKlinikum rechts der Isar · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Adoptive transfer of T cells genetically modified by TCRs or CARs represents a highly attractive novel therapeutic strategy to treat malignant diseases. Various approaches for the development of such gene therapy medicinal products (GTMPs) have been initiated by scientists in recent years. To date, however, the number of clinical trials commenced in Germany and Europe is still low. Several hurdles may contribute to the delay in clinical translation of these therapeutic innovations including the significant complexity of manufacture and non-clinical testing of these novel medicinal products, the limited knowledge about the intricate regulatory requirements of the academic developers as well as limitations of funds for clinical testing. A suitable good manufacturing practice (GMP) environment is a key prerequisite and platform for the development, validation, and manufacture of such cell-based therapies, but may also represent a bottleneck for clinical translation. The German Cancer Consortium (DKTK) and the Paul-Ehrlich-Institut (PEI) have initiated joint efforts of researchers and regulators to facilitate and advance early phase, academia-driven clinical trials. Starting with a workshop held in 2016, stakeholders from academia and regulatory authorities in Germany have entered into continuing discussions on a diversity of scientific, manufacturing, and regulatory aspects, as well as the benefits and risks of clinical application of CAR/TCR-based cell therapies. This review summarizes the current state of discussions of this cooperative approach providing a basis for further policy-making and suitable modification of processes.

Indexed as

Immunotherapy, AdoptiveCell- and Tissue-Based TherapyGermanyHumansNeoplasmsPractice Guidelines as TopicReceptors, Antigen, T-CellReceptors, Chimeric AntigenT-LymphocytesTranslational Research, BiomedicalReceptors, Antigen, T-CellReceptors, Chimeric AntigenCAR/TCR-transgenic T cellsCellular therapyClinical translationRegulatory aspects

Identifiers

PMID29380009
PMCPMC11028374
OpenAlexW2787121063

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.