Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29379865›Full record

ArticleeNeuro

Transcranial Alternating Current Stimulation Modulates Risky Decision Making in a Frequency-Controlled Experiment.

Zachary Yaple, Mario Martinez-Saito, Bhuvanesh Awasthi, Matteo Feurra, Anna Shestakova, Vasily Klucharev

Erratum issuedOpen access · goldAbstract readControlled Clinical Trial
In one paragraph

Article in eNeuro. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 23 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 47 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Probing the Link Between Perception and Oscillations: Lessons from Transcranial Alternating Current Stimulation.The Neuroscientist : a review journal bringing neurobiology, neurology and psychiatry · 2020
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Zachary YapleCentre for Cognition and Decision Making, National Research University Higher School of Economics, Moscow 109316, Russian Federation.ORCID 0000-0002-6006-9777
Mario Martinez-SaitoCentre for Cognition and Decision Making, National Research University Higher School of Economics, Moscow 109316, Russian Federation.ORCID 0000-0001-6794-336X
Bhuvanesh Awasthi
Matteo FeurraCentre for Cognition and Decision Making, National Research University Higher School of Economics, Moscow 109316, Russian Federation.ORCID 0000-0003-0934-6764
Anna ShestakovaCentre for Cognition and Decision Making, National Research University Higher School of Economics, Moscow 109316, Russian Federation.ORCID 0000-0001-9374-9878
Vasily KlucharevCentre for Cognition and Decision Making, National Research University Higher School of Economics, Moscow 109316, Russian Federation.ORCID 0000-0002-5257-3789
National Research University Higher School of Economics · RU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In this study, we investigated the effect of transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS) on voluntary risky decision making and executive control in humans. Stimulation was delivered online at 5 Hz (θ), 10 Hz (α), 20 Hz (β), and 40 Hz (γ) on the left and right frontal area while participants performed a modified risky decision-making task. This task allowed participants to voluntarily select between risky and certain decisions associated with potential gains or losses, while simultaneously measuring the cognitive control component (voluntary switching) of decision making. The purpose of this experimental design was to test whether voluntary risky decision making and executive control can be modulated with tACS in a frequency-specific manner. Our results revealed a robust effect of a 20-Hz stimulation over the left prefrontal area that significantly increased voluntary risky decision making, which may suggest a possible link between risky decision making and reward processing, underlined by β-oscillatory activity.

Indexed as

Risk-TakingTranscranial Direct Current StimulationAdolescentAdultDecision MakingExecutive FunctionFemaleHumansMalePrefrontal CortexYoung Adult20-Hz stimulationfrontal hemisphererewardrisky decision makingtask switchingtranscranial alternating current stimulation

Identifiers

PMID29379865
PMCPMC5779115
OpenAlexW2765773868

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.