Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29379844›Full record

ArticleAsia-Pacific journal of oncology nursing

Developing Written Information for Cancer Survivors from Culturally and Linguistically Diverse Backgrounds: Lessons Learnt.

Georgina Wiley, Amanda Piper, A M Phyllis Butow, Penny Schofield, Fiona Douglas, Jane Roy, Linda Nolte, Michael Jefford

Open access · goldAbstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in Asia-Pacific journal of oncology nursing. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. What services are available for culturally and linguistically diverse (CALD) patients in the cancer survivorship setting? An Australian study.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

Georgina WileyAustralian Cancer Survivorship Centre - A Richard Pratt Legacy, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Amanda PiperAustralian Cancer Survivorship Centre - A Richard Pratt Legacy, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
A M Phyllis ButowPsycho-oncology Co-operative Research Group, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Penny SchofieldDepartment of Psychological Sciences, Swinburne University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Fiona DouglasCancer Council Victoria, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Jane RoyCancer Council Australia, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Linda NolteAustralian Cancer Survivorship Centre - A Richard Pratt Legacy, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Michael JeffordAustralian Cancer Survivorship Centre - A Richard Pratt Legacy, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Cancer Australia · AUPeter MacCallum Cancer Centre · AUCancer Council Australia · AUCancer Council Victoria · AUSwinburne University of Technology · AUUniversity of Sydney · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Australia is a multicultural nation with a large migrant population. Migrants with cancer report inferior quality of life and the need for more information in their own language. This paper describes lessons learnt from developing culturally appropriate written information resources with and for Arabic, Italian, and Vietnamese cancer survivors and carers. The information needs of survivors from these language groups as well as guidelines for the development of written resources for culturally diverse populations were identified through literature review. Community consultation was undertaken with focus groups. The content was developed and tested with health professionals who spoke the appropriate language and focus group participants, ensuring relevance and appropriateness. Resource design and dissemination were informed through community consultation. A number of key tasks for developing resources were identified as follows: (1) community engagement and consultation; (2) culturally sensitive data collection; (3) focus group facilitators (recruitment and training); (4) content development; (5) translation and review process; (6) design; and (7) sustainability. This project reinforced literature review findings on the importance of cultural sensitivity in the development of resources. Engaging with community groups and incorporating culturally appropriate recruitment strategies optimises recruitment to focus groups and facilitates content development. Stakeholders and lay persons from the intended ethnic-minority communities should be involved in the development and formative evaluation of resources to ensure appropriateness and relevance and in the dissemination strategy to optimize penetration. We believe the lessons we have learnt will be relevant to any group intending to develop health information for culturally and linguistic diverse groups.

Indexed as

and supportCancer survivorshipculturally and linguistically diverseinformation

Identifiers

PMID29379844
PMCPMC5763430
OpenAlexW2775720028

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.