Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29379772›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology2017

The Potential for Topical Probiotic Treatment of Chronic Rhinosinusitis, a Personal Perspective.

Anders U Cervin

Registry-linked trialAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05427695 (Topical Probiotic Sinus Irrigations for the Treatment of Chronic Rhinosinusitis), which is not on this map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05427695 phase2recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2025, after this paper: background citation

Topical Probiotic Sinus Irrigations for the Treatment of Chronic Rhinosinusitis: a Double Blinded Randomized Controlled Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of Illinois at ChicagoRan2025 to 2028Enrolled60ConditionsChronic Rhinosinusitis (Diagnosis)ArmsLactobacillus sakei proBio65, Isotonic Saline Solution
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Anders U CervinFaculty of Medicine, The Garnett Passe and Rodney Williams Memorial Foundation Chair in Otolaryngology, (Rhinology), University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This review describes the rationale for topical probiotic intervention, the obstacles we are facing and a strategy for future research in the use of probiotics to modify CRS symptoms and disease expression. Recent advances in molecular microbiology has revealed a plethora of microbial DNA in the nasal cavity and sinuses of healthy subjects as well as in chronic sinusitis (CRS) patients. An infection is today rather seen as an imbalance between the commensal microbiome and the bacterial pathogens, resulting in a reduction in commensal bacterial diversity, combined with an increase in the growth of microbes eliciting an inflammatory response. This will in turn lead to the clinical symptoms of sinusitis. Probiotics (microorganisms that confer a health benefit) can be used either as a form of living antibiotics treatment, or as an immune-modulatory intervention. Topical probiotics, which is the focus of this review, have shown efficacy in a limited number of trials in otitis media and tonsillitis, but to date not in CRS. Although bacterial interference capacity against pathogens can be determined in

Indexed as

Administration, TopicalChronic DiseaseDysbiosisHumansProbioticsSinusitisairwaychronic sinusitisclinical trialmicrobial dysbiosismicrobiotaprobiotic

Identifiers

PMID29379772
PMCPMC5770906

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.