ArticleGastroenterology and hepatology from bed to bench2017
Network analysis of common genes related to esophageal, gastric, and colon cancers.
Article in Gastroenterology and hepatology from bed to bench, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.
- Clinical significance of peripheral T-cell receptor repertoire profiling and individualized nomograms in patients with gastrointestinal cancer treated with anti-programmed death 1 antibody.Translational gastroenterology and hepatology · 2024Article
- Ontologies and Knowledge Graphs in Oncology Research.Cancers · 2022Review
- The p53 Pathway Related Genes Predict the Prognosis of Colon Cancer.International journal of general medicine · 2022Article
- A network pharmacology-based investigation on the bioactive ingredients and molecular mechanisms of Gelsemium elegans Benth against colorectal cancer.BMC complementary medicine and therapies · 2021Article
- Network Pharmacology and Molecular Docking on the Molecular Mechanism of Luo-hua-zi-zhu (LHZZ) Granule in the Prevention and Treatment of Bowel Precancerous Lesions.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2021Article
- The signature of pharmaceutical sensitivity based on ctDNA mutation in eleven cancers.Experimental biology and medicine (Maywood, N.J.) · 2020Article
- Gene and Biochemical Pathway Evaluation of Burns Injury via Protein-Protein Interaction Network Analysis.Galen medical journal · 2019Article
- Human Prolactinoma: A View of Protein-Protein Interaction Pattern.International journal of endocrinology and metabolism · 2018Article
- Network analysis of grade II into grade III transition in rectum cancer patients.Gastroenterology and hepatology from bed to bench · 2018Article
- Prediction ofGalen medical journal · 2018Article
- Protein-Protein Interaction Network Analysis Revealed a New Prospective of Posttraumatic Stress Disorder.Galen medical journal · 2018Article
- Pancreatic adenocarcinoma protein-protein interaction network analysis.Gastroenterology and hepatology from bed to bench · 2017Article
- Protein interaction mapping interpretation of none alcoholic fatty liver disease model of rats after fat diet feeding.Gastroenterology and hepatology from bed to bench · 2017Article
- Common and differential genetically pathways between ulcerative colitis and colon adenocarcinoma.Gastroenterology and hepatology from bed to bench · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
aimThe aim of this study was to provide a biomarker panel for esophageal, gastric and colorectal cancers. It can help introducing some diagnostic biomarkers for these diseases.
backgroundGastrointestinal cancers (GICs) including esophageal, gastric and colorectal cancers are the most common cancers in the world which are usually diagnosed in the final stages and due to heterogeneity of these diseases, the treatments usually are not successful. For this reason, many studies have been conducted to discover predictive biomarkers.
methodsIn the present study, 507 genes related to esophageal, gastric and colon cancers were extracted.. The network was constructed by Cytoscape software (version 3.4.0). Then a main component of the network was analyzed considering centrality parameters including degree, betweenness, closeness and stress. Three clusters of the protein network accompanied with their seed nodes were determined by MCODE application in Cytoscape software. Furthermore, Gene Ontology (GO) analysis of the key genes in combination to the seed nodes was performed.
resultsThe network of 17 common differential expressed genes in three esophageal, gastric and colon adenocarcinomas including 1730 nodes and 9188 edges were constructed. Eight crucial genes were determined. Three Clusters of the network were analyzed by GO analysis.
conclusionThe analyses of common genes of the three cancers showed that there are some common crucial genes including TP53, EGFR, MYC, AKT1, CDKN2A, CCND1 and HSP90AA1 which are tightly related to gastrointestinal cancers and can be predictive biomarkers for these cancers.
Indexed as
Identifiers
29379595PMC5758738W2766164886What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.