Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29379366›Full record

ArticleSaudi journal of biological sciences2018

Rapid plant regeneration, validation of genetic integrity by ISSR markers and conservation of

Fahad Al-Qurainy, Mohammad Nadeem, Salim Khan, Saleh Alansi, Mohamed Tarroum, Abdulhafed A Al-Ameri, Abdel-Rhman Z Gaafar, Aref Alshameri

Abstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Saudi journal of biological sciences, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. In vitro Regeneration of Hyssopus officinalis L. and Plant Genetic Similarity.Doklady biological sciences : proceedings of the Academy of Sciences of the USSR, Biological sciences sections · 2021
    Article
  3. Article
  4. RAPD, ISSR, and SCoT markers based genetic stability assessment of micropropagatedPhysiology and molecular biology of plants : an international journal of functional plant biology · 2021
    Article
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Fahad Al-QurainyDepartment of Botany and Microbiology, College of Science, King Saud University, Riyadh 11451, Saudi Arabia.
Mohammad NadeemDepartment of Botany and Microbiology, College of Science, King Saud University, Riyadh 11451, Saudi Arabia.
Salim KhanDepartment of Botany and Microbiology, College of Science, King Saud University, Riyadh 11451, Saudi Arabia.
Saleh AlansiDepartment of Botany and Microbiology, College of Science, King Saud University, Riyadh 11451, Saudi Arabia.
Mohamed TarroumDepartment of Botany and Microbiology, College of Science, King Saud University, Riyadh 11451, Saudi Arabia.
Abdulhafed A Al-AmeriDepartment of Botany and Microbiology, College of Science, King Saud University, Riyadh 11451, Saudi Arabia.
Abdel-Rhman Z GaafarDepartment of Botany and Microbiology, College of Science, King Saud University, Riyadh 11451, Saudi Arabia.
Aref AlshameriDepartment of Botany and Microbiology, College of Science, King Saud University, Riyadh 11451, Saudi Arabia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as

ConservationEndemicMicropropagationReseda pentagynaTissue culture

Identifiers

PMID29379366
PMCPMC5775100

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.