Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29379300›Full record

ArticleOncoTargets and therapy2018

The effects of naloxone on human breast cancer progression: in vitro and in vivo studies on MDA.MB231 cells.

Sabrina Bimonte, Antonio Barbieri, Marco Cascella, Domenica Rea, Giuseppe Palma, Vitale Del Vecchio, Cira Antonietta Forte, Francesco Del Prato, Claudio Arra, Arturo Cuomo

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in OncoTargets and therapy, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 39 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Anesthesia and cancer recurrence: a narrative review.Anesthesia and pain medicine · 2024
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Pathophysiology of Nociception and Rare Genetic Disorders with Increased Pain Threshold or Pain Insensitivity.Pathophysiology : the official journal of the International Society for Pathophysiology · 2022
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Anesthesia and Oncology: Friend or Foe?Frontiers in oncology · 2022
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Morpheus and the Underworld-Interventions to Reduce the Risks of Opioid Use After Surgery: ORADEs, Dependence, Cancer Progression, and Anastomotic Leakage.Journal of gastrointestinal surgery : official journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract · 2019
    Review
  14. Methanolic Extract ofEvidence-based complementary and alternative medicine : eCAM · 2019
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Sabrina Bimonte *Division of Anesthesia and Pain Medicine, Istituto Nazionale Tumori - IRCCS - "Fondazione G. Pascale".
Antonio Barbieri *Animal Facility Unit, Department of Research, National Cancer Institute "G. Pascale", Naples, Italy.
Marco Cascella *Division of Anesthesia and Pain Medicine, Istituto Nazionale Tumori - IRCCS - "Fondazione G. Pascale".
Domenica Rea *Animal Facility Unit, Department of Research, National Cancer Institute "G. Pascale", Naples, Italy.
Giuseppe PalmaAnimal Facility Unit, Department of Research, National Cancer Institute "G. Pascale", Naples, Italy.
Vitale Del VecchioAnimal Facility Unit, Department of Research, National Cancer Institute "G. Pascale", Naples, Italy.
Cira Antonietta ForteDivision of Anesthesia and Pain Medicine, Istituto Nazionale Tumori - IRCCS - "Fondazione G. Pascale".
Francesco Del PratoDivision of Anesthesia and Pain Medicine, Istituto Nazionale Tumori - IRCCS - "Fondazione G. Pascale".
Claudio ArraDivision of Anesthesia and Pain Medicine, Istituto Nazionale Tumori - IRCCS - "Fondazione G. Pascale".
Arturo CuomoAnimal Facility Unit, Department of Research, National Cancer Institute "G. Pascale", Naples, Italy.
Istituto Nazionale Tumori IRCCS "Fondazione G. Pascale" · ITNational Cancer Institute · MY

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundNaloxone is viewed as a specific competitive opioid antagonist acting at the level of opioid receptors (μ, δ, and κ) with blended agonist-adversary or agonist action. The role of naloxone in tumor cell growth has been poorly studied in human cancer cell lines. MATERIALS AND

methodsIn the present study, we report findings from in vitro and in vivo experiments performed to evaluate the effects of naloxone on human breast cancer cell growth and progression. In vitro assays were conducted on estrogen receptor-negative human breast carcinoma cells, MDA.MB231, treated with naloxone at different concentrations (10-100 μM). In vivo experiments were performed on a mouse model of human triple-negative breast cancer generated by using MDA.MB231 injected subcutaneously in mice. Naloxone was daily intraperitoneally injected in mice at 0.357 mg/kg for 2 weeks and at 0.714 mg/kg for the next 2 weeks. Microvessels formation was detected by fluorescein isothiocyanate-dextran (100 μL) injected into the tail vein of mice and confirmed by immunohistochemistry with CD31 on mice tumor sections.

resultsIn vitro tests showed that the cell proliferation of MDA.MB231 was inhibited by naloxone in a dose-dependent manner, whereas the cell death was increased. In vivo studies demonstrated that tumors of mice treated with naloxone were significantly smaller than those observed in the control groups, as long as naloxone was administered. Finally, naloxone was not able to impair the microvessel formation in tumors of treated mice.

conclusionOur data showed, for the first time, that naloxone reduced breast cancer progression without affecting angiogenesis.

Indexed as

angiogenesisbreast cancermicrovessel formationnaloxoneproliferation

Identifiers

PMID29379300
PMCPMC5757202
OpenAlexW2782235279

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.