Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29379275›Full record

ArticlePatient preference and adherence2018

Real-life experience of quality of life, treatment satisfaction, and adherence in patients receiving oral anticoagulants for atrial fibrillation.

Michaël Benzimra, Béatrix Bonnamour, Martin Duracinsky, Christophe Lalanne, Jean-Pierre Aubert, Olivier Chassany, Isabelle Aubin-Auger, Isabelle Mahé

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Patient preference and adherence, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
7.8field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 69 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Observational
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Observational
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Michaël BenzimraInternal Medicine Department, Hôpital Louis Mourier, APHP, Colombes, France.
Béatrix BonnamourInternal Medicine Department, Hôpital Louis Mourier, APHP, Colombes, France.
Martin DuracinskyMéthodologies et Société (REMES) EA 7334, Recherche Clinique Ville-hôpital, Université Paris Diderot, Sorbonne Paris Cité, Paris, France.
Christophe LalanneMéthodologies et Société (REMES) EA 7334, Recherche Clinique Ville-hôpital, Université Paris Diderot, Sorbonne Paris Cité, Paris, France.
Jean-Pierre AubertMéthodologies et Société (REMES) EA 7334, Recherche Clinique Ville-hôpital, Université Paris Diderot, Sorbonne Paris Cité, Paris, France.
Olivier ChassanyMéthodologies et Société (REMES) EA 7334, Recherche Clinique Ville-hôpital, Université Paris Diderot, Sorbonne Paris Cité, Paris, France.
Isabelle Aubin-AugerMéthodologies et Société (REMES) EA 7334, Recherche Clinique Ville-hôpital, Université Paris Diderot, Sorbonne Paris Cité, Paris, France.
Isabelle MahéInternal Medicine Department, Hôpital Louis Mourier, APHP, Colombes, France.
Sorbonne Paris Cité · FRUniversité Paris Cité · FRHôpital Louis-Mourier · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionDirect oral anticoagulants (DOACs) have shown noninferiority to vitamin K antagonists (VKA) in stroke prevention in patients with atrial fibrillation. DOAC treatment may be less demanding than VKA, improving quality of life. To date, there have been no studies of the real-life experience of outpatients receiving anticoagulation therapy for atrial fibrillation in France.

methodsAn observational descriptive real-life epidemiological study used three validated questionnaires (EQ-5D, PACT-Q2, and MMAS-8 French Translation) to assess quality of life, treatment satisfaction, and adherence, respectively, in 200 patients managed on an outpatient basis for atrial fibrillation who were receiving anticoagulation therapy by VKA or DOAC for at least 3 months. Patients were distributed between four groups: primary VKA (P-VKA), switch from VKA to DOAC (S-DOAC), primary DOAC (P-DOAC), and switch from DOAC to VKA (S-VKA).

resultsTwo hundred patients responded to the questionnaires: 89, 50, 52, and 9 in the P-VKA, S-DOAC, P-DOAC and S-VKA groups, respectively. Only the first three groups were compared statistically, because of the small size of the S-VKA group. Quality of life and satisfaction were good in all three groups, with no significant difference in quality of life but significantly greater satisfaction with respect to the "convenience" and "satisfaction" dimensions for DOACs (S-DOAC and P-DOAC groups versus P-VKA group;

conclusionThe experience of patients under oral anticoagulation therapy for atrial fibrillation managed on an outpatient basis was good, with comparable quality of life under DOACs and VKA, and significantly greater satisfaction under DOACs, without impact on adherence. Taking account of patient preference in "shared decision-making" for the choice of type of anticoagulant could improve the patients' experience of treatment.

Indexed as

adherenceatrial fibrillationdirect oral anticoagulantsquality of lifesatisfactionvitamin K antagonists

Identifiers

PMID29379275
PMCPMC5757966
OpenAlexW2781675735

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.