Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29378936›Full record

SynthesisProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2018

Child first language and adult second language are both tied to general-purpose learning systems.

Phillip Hamrick, Jarrad A G Lum, Michael T Ullman

Open access · bronzeAbstract readMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed
7.2field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 118 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Distinguishable features of spontaneous speech in Alzheimer's clinical syndrome and healthy controls.Neuropsychology, development, and cognition. Section B, Aging, neuropsychology and cognition · 2024
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Neuropsychological Test Performance Among Native and Non-Native Swedes: Second Language Effects.Archives of clinical neuropsychology : the official journal of the National Academy of Neuropsychologists · 2022
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Domain-General Learning and Memory Substrates of Reading Acquisition.Mind, brain and education : the official journal of the International Mind, Brain, and Education Society · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Phillip HamrickLanguage and Cognition Research Laboratory, Department of English, Kent State University, Kent, OH 44242; phamric1@kent.edu michael@georgetown.edu.
Jarrad A G LumCognitive Neuroscience Unit, School of Psychology, Deakin University, Melbourne, VIC 3125, Australia.
Michael T UllmanBrain and Language Laboratory, Department of Neuroscience, Georgetown University, Washington, DC 20057 phamric1@kent.edu michael@georgetown.edu.ORCID 0000-0001-9037-3537
Deakin University · AUGeorgetown University · USKent State University · US

Funding

The neurocognition of procedural and declarative memory in dyslexia and S-RCDR21HD087088 · NICHD · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY · PI CUTTING, LAURIE E · 2016 to 2017
$434k
NICHD NIH HHS R21 HD087088
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Do the mechanisms underlying language in fact serve general-purpose functions that preexist this uniquely human capacity? To address this contentious and empirically challenging issue, we systematically tested the predictions of a well-studied neurocognitive theory of language motivated by evolutionary principles. Multiple metaanalyses were performed to examine predicted links between language and two general-purpose learning systems, declarative and procedural memory. The results tied lexical abilities to learning only in declarative memory, while grammar was linked to learning in both systems in both child first language and adult second language, in specific ways. In second language learners, grammar was associated with only declarative memory at lower language experience, but with only procedural memory at higher experience. The findings yielded large effect sizes and held consistently across languages, language families, linguistic structures, and tasks, underscoring their reliability and validity. The results, which met the predicted pattern, provide comprehensive evidence that language is tied to general-purpose systems both in children acquiring their native language and adults learning an additional language. Crucially, if language learning relies on these systems, then our extensive knowledge of the systems from animal and human studies may also apply to this domain, leading to predictions that might be unwarranted in the more circumscribed study of language. Thus, by demonstrating a role for these systems in language, the findings simultaneously lay a foundation for potentially important advances in the study of this critical domain.

Indexed as

LanguageLearningAdultChildChild, PreschoolHumansMemoryVocabularydeclarative memorydomain-generallanguagelearningprocedural memory

Identifiers

PMID29378936
PMCPMC5816159
OpenAlexW2793685305

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.