Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29378935›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2018

RNA force field with accuracy comparable to state-of-the-art protein force fields.

Dazhi Tan, Stefano Piana, Robert M Dirks, David E Shaw

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 136 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
136citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

136 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Journal of molecular biology · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Reparameterization of the Amber RNA Force Field Non-Bonded Terms.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Destabilization of Structured RNAs by OPC and TIP4PD Water Models.Journal of chemical theory and computation · 2026
    Article
  9. Article
  10. bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. The Kink-Turn 7 Motif: An Additional Test for RNA Force Field Performance.Journal of chemical theory and computation · 2025
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Blind prediction of complex water and ion ensembles around RNA in CASP16.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

76 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Dazhi TanD. E. Shaw Research, New York, NY 10036.
Stefano PianaD. E. Shaw Research, New York, NY 10036; Stefano.Piana-Agostinetti@DEShawResearch.com David.Shaw@DEShawResearch.com.
Robert M DirksD. E. Shaw Research, New York, NY 10036.
David E ShawD. E. Shaw Research, New York, NY 10036; Stefano.Piana-Agostinetti@DEShawResearch.com David.Shaw@DEShawResearch.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Molecular dynamics (MD) simulation has become a powerful tool for characterizing at an atomic level of detail the conformational changes undergone by proteins. The application of such simulations to RNA structures, however, has proven more challenging, due in large part to the fact that the physical models ("force fields") available for MD simulations of RNA molecules are substantially less accurate in many respects than those currently available for proteins. Here, we introduce an extensive revision of a widely used RNA force field in which the parameters have been modified, based on quantum mechanical calculations and existing experimental information, to more accurately reflect the fundamental forces that stabilize RNA structures. We evaluate these revised parameters through long-timescale MD simulations of a set of RNA molecules that covers a wide range of structural complexity, including single-stranded RNAs, RNA duplexes, RNA hairpins, and riboswitches. The structural and thermodynamic properties measured in these simulations exhibited dramatically improved agreement with experimentally determined values. Based on the comparisons we performed, this RNA force field appears to achieve a level of accuracy comparable to that of state-of-the-art protein force fields, thus significantly advancing the utility of MD simulation as a tool for elucidating the structural dynamics and function of RNA molecules and RNA-containing biological assemblies.

Indexed as

Computational BiologyMolecular Dynamics SimulationNucleic Acid ConformationHumansModels, MolecularProteinsRNAThermodynamicsProteinsRNAAMBERAntonforce fieldmolecular dynamics simulationsnucleic acid

Identifiers

PMID29378935
PMCPMC5816156

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.